2014
DOI: 10.1107/s1600576714001964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron diffraction studies of a double-crystal (+n,–m) setting containing a fully asymmetric diffraction geometry of a bent perfect crystal with output beam expansion

Abstract: The neutron diffraction properties of a double‐crystal (+n,−m) setting, which contains a bent perfect Si(311) crystal in the fully asymmetric diffraction (FAD) geometry with output beam expansion and a bent perfect Si(220) crystal in the symmetric diffraction geometry, are presented. Generally, there are two possibilities for the FAD geometry: either with output beam compression or with output beam expansion. In this case, attention has been focused on the latter. The properties of the (+n,−m) double‐bent‐crys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically, the vertical and horizontal focusing radii should be identical for Si(400) and Si(311) at the same take-off angle. However, there are some differences in these tests, possibly due to asymmetric reflection in Si(311) (Seong et al, 2010;Mikula et al, 2014). These results indicate that the neutron flux at the sample position is comparable to that of other neutron diffractometers.…”
Section: Neutron Flux At the Sample Positionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Theoretically, the vertical and horizontal focusing radii should be identical for Si(400) and Si(311) at the same take-off angle. However, there are some differences in these tests, possibly due to asymmetric reflection in Si(311) (Seong et al, 2010;Mikula et al, 2014). These results indicate that the neutron flux at the sample position is comparable to that of other neutron diffractometers.…”
Section: Neutron Flux At the Sample Positionmentioning
confidence: 57%