1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf02074090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron cross section of236Pu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first remark that we can make is about the generally good agreement between our results and the evaluated curves with the notable exception of the 243 Pu(n, f ) reaction. Standard fission-cross section evaluations include this isotope among the nonfissile nuclei, a fact invalidated by the present barrier height values, which are deduced from the 242 Pu(t, pf ) reaction and much [41], and JENDL-4.0 [42]) and to recent measurements by Tovesson et al [43], Laptev et al [44], Fursov et al [45], and Gromova et al [46]. smaller than the neutron emission threshold (refer to 244 Pu* in Table II).…”
Section: Fission Cross Sections Calculated Over a Suite Of Pu Isotmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first remark that we can make is about the generally good agreement between our results and the evaluated curves with the notable exception of the 243 Pu(n, f ) reaction. Standard fission-cross section evaluations include this isotope among the nonfissile nuclei, a fact invalidated by the present barrier height values, which are deduced from the 242 Pu(t, pf ) reaction and much [41], and JENDL-4.0 [42]) and to recent measurements by Tovesson et al [43], Laptev et al [44], Fursov et al [45], and Gromova et al [46]. smaller than the neutron emission threshold (refer to 244 Pu* in Table II).…”
Section: Fission Cross Sections Calculated Over a Suite Of Pu Isotmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(45) and (46) for the strength functions are mainly from theoretical considerations and the total radiation widths calculated in this way broadly agree (within 10% to 20%) with measured radiation widths, we have made a further empirical adjustment to them so that for 240 Pu + n the calculation is in very close agreement with the radiation width measurement by Harvey et al [38] at the 1.06-eV resonance; this appears to be the most accurate radiation width measurement available in the literature.…”
Section: -14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). More specifically, only one dataset exists for neutron energies up to 9.5 MeV [2] and a few around 14.5 MeV with large discrepancies among them [3][4][5][6][7]. These datasets are mainly deduced by measuring the α-particles of the 236 Pu decay after chemical separation of Pu from Np and using 239 Pu/ 242 Pu tracers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%