2000
DOI: 10.2172/759039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron Cross Section Evaluations of Fission Products Below the Fast Energy Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• The Atlas file is then converted into an ENDF-6 format with the aid of the computer program PTANAL [7]. In this procedure, average s-and p-wave radiative widths are supplied when such data is missing, and spin assignments of resonances of undetermined values are randomly made with the condition that the (2J+1) law for level density is followed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The Atlas file is then converted into an ENDF-6 format with the aid of the computer program PTANAL [7]. In this procedure, average s-and p-wave radiative widths are supplied when such data is missing, and spin assignments of resonances of undetermined values are randomly made with the condition that the (2J+1) law for level density is followed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the contribution from the interference term approximately cancels out, the result of integration is similar to the capture kernel and reads [1] (see p.72, Eq.3.3) 21) where the cross section is restricted to the resonance term, σ res n (E). The average scattering cross section in sufficiently broad energy group of the width ∆E = E 1 − E 2 around the resonance energy E 0 can thus be obtained as 22) which is the sum of potential scattering and resonance scattering, 23) with the resonance term being similar to the expression for the average capture cross section.…”
Section: Low Energy Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Unknown spins are assigned by the code PTANAL using approach often adopted by evaluators of MF2 data [22]. The assignments are made statistically in accordance with spin distribution prescribed by nuclear level densities.…”
Section: Evaluation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nd which is due to differences in the parameters of the bound level in the Atlas as compared to that of Oh et al [4], particularly the spin of the bound level. The other major difference between the present work and the Atlas value is the resonance capture integral of Nd capture cross sections and comparing them to ENDF/B-VI.8, JEFF-3.1 and JENDL-3.3 libraries and to the measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%