2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron conversion–diffusion: a new model for structured short gamma-ray burst jets compatible with GRB 170817

Abstract: We present a generic theoretical model for the structuring of a relativistic jet propagating through the ejecta of a binary neutron star merger event, introducing the effects of the neutron conversion-diffusion, which provides a baryon flux propagating transversely from the ejecta towards the jet axis. This results naturally in an increased baryon load structure of the outer jet with the approximate isotropic energy distribution Eiso(θ)∝θ−4, which is compatible with the first gravitational wave and short gamma… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.4.3.1 Mixing in the cocoon and the parameter fmix: As previously pointed out, the shocked jet part is very baryonpoor, and its mass density is negligible compared to that of the shocked ejecta part (see Figures 1 and 5) (Bromberg et al 2011). However, as the shocked jet part is adjacent to the dense shocked ejecta part, a fraction of the shocked jet part is exposed to being mixed with the shocked ejecta part (Nakar & Piran 2017; also see Preau et al 2021). Such mixing continues to happen throughout the jet propagation, and the shocked jet part of the cocoon is constantly being created (by and near the jet) and dissipated (in the shocked ejecta part, after being mixed with it); the balance of these two processes determines its final properties (at t b ).…”
Section: Breakout Of the Shocked Jet Cocoonmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3.4.3.1 Mixing in the cocoon and the parameter fmix: As previously pointed out, the shocked jet part is very baryonpoor, and its mass density is negligible compared to that of the shocked ejecta part (see Figures 1 and 5) (Bromberg et al 2011). However, as the shocked jet part is adjacent to the dense shocked ejecta part, a fraction of the shocked jet part is exposed to being mixed with the shocked ejecta part (Nakar & Piran 2017; also see Preau et al 2021). Such mixing continues to happen throughout the jet propagation, and the shocked jet part of the cocoon is constantly being created (by and near the jet) and dissipated (in the shocked ejecta part, after being mixed with it); the balance of these two processes determines its final properties (at t b ).…”
Section: Breakout Of the Shocked Jet Cocoonmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…As reviewed in Section 2.3, the cocoon is composed of two distinct parts: the "shocked jet" part (low density and high fraction of internal energy in its total energy) and the "shocked ejecta" part (much higher density and lower internal energy fraction in its total energy) [see Bromberg et al (2011), the inner and outer cocoons in their Figure 1; also see Figure 1]. These two part are adjacent to each other, and are constantly being mixed making them difficult to differentiate (see Nakar & Piran 2017; also see Gottlieb et al 2021 for more details about mixing; see also Preau et al 2021). Hereafter, the "shocked jet" part is used to refer only to fluid elements of the initially pure shocked jet part that are still able to escaped the ejecta (i.e., with β inf > βm) 8 .…”
Section: Breakout Of the Two Components Of The Cocoon: Shocked Ejecta...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exact relation depends on how the medium is expanding, the ratio of the energy density for the jet to ejecta, and weakly on the timescale. Additionally, particle effects such as neutron conversion-diffusion may contribute to the resultant jet structure (Preau et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these instabilities grow to large amplitudes, they can lead to substantial entrainment of baryons into the jet which can alter the jet dynamics and its emission properties (Aloy et al 2000;MacFadyen et al 2001;Gottlieb et al 2019;Matsumoto & Masada 2019). Strong mixing of jet material with the cocoon prior to breakout leads to heavy baryon loading especially after the collimation point (see e.g., Preau et al 2021). The degree of mixing is strongly influenced by the jet power, injection angle and density of the stellar medium (e.g., Gottlieb et al 2020): high-power jets with small injection angle propagating in low density medium develop faster moving jet-head and show a smaller degree of mixing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%