1981
DOI: 10.1086/202671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron Activation of Turquoise Artifacts From Chaco Canyon, New Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since turquoise did not occur naturally in the canyon, the large quantities that have been excavated there by archaeologists must have been imported. The most likely source was the Cerrillos mine, which is located approximately 100 miles to the east-southeast (Weigand, Harbottle, and Sayre 1977;Mathien 1981). However, at least some turquoise was also obtained from mines in Arizona and Colorado (Sieglo 1970).…”
Section: Turquoisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since turquoise did not occur naturally in the canyon, the large quantities that have been excavated there by archaeologists must have been imported. The most likely source was the Cerrillos mine, which is located approximately 100 miles to the east-southeast (Weigand, Harbottle, and Sayre 1977;Mathien 1981). However, at least some turquoise was also obtained from mines in Arizona and Colorado (Sieglo 1970).…”
Section: Turquoisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first scientific efforts to identify the sources of archaeological turquoise employed trace-element analyses to infer links between artifacts and mines (Sigleo, 1975;Weigand et al, 1977). Trace-element analysis remained the dominant approach to investigating turquoise provenance for three decades (e.g., Sigleo, 1975;Mathien, 1981;Kim et al, 2003), but most investigations were small scale, and at least one was unable to separate mines based on trace-element profiles (e.g., Mathien and Olinger, 1992). The one large-scale program devoted to turquoise sourcing measured the trace-element compositions of thousands of archaeological and geological turquoise samples by neutron activation (Weigand et al, 1977;Harbottle and Weigand, 1992;Weigand, 1994;Weigand and Harbottle, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This connection is hardly new; archaeologists have long recognized that turquoise was valued among many of the region's prehispanic societies. Many consider the valuation and distribution of turquoise within an economic framework (e.g., Di Peso 1968; Frisbie 1980; Lummis 1920:219; Riley 1980:15), and focus on questions of procurement and exchange (e.g., Harbottle and Weigand 1992; Hull et al, 2008; Judge et al 1981; Mathien 1981, 1986, 1993; Reyman 1995; Snow 1973; Weigand 1992, 1994; Weigand and Harbottle 1993; Weigand et al 1977; Windes 1987, 1992; Young et al 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%