2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.64.035501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutrinoless double beta decay of76Ge,82Se,

Abstract: The neutrinoless double beta decay (0νββ-decay) transition to the first excited 0 + collective final state is examined for A=76, 82, 100 and 136 nuclei by assuming light and heavy Majorana neutrino exchange mechanisms as well as the trilinear R-parity violating contributions. Realistic calculations of nuclear matrix elements have been performed within the renormalized Quasiparticle Random Phase Approximation. Transitions to the first excited twoquadrupole phonon 0 + state are described within a boson expansion… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, there appears to be no correlation between IBM-2 and other calculations. It should be noted, however, that the QRPA-Tü results shown in Table V were done before an error was discovered in the treatment of short-range correlations [34] and with two different methods for treating the excited 0 + 2 state, the recoupling method (RCM) and the boson expansion method (BEM) [32]. These results are therefore inconsistent by a factor of approximately 2 with those in Table IV and Ref.…”
Section: νββ Decay With Light Neutrino Exchangecontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…In this case, there appears to be no correlation between IBM-2 and other calculations. It should be noted, however, that the QRPA-Tü results shown in Table V were done before an error was discovered in the treatment of short-range correlations [34] and with two different methods for treating the excited 0 + 2 state, the recoupling method (RCM) and the boson expansion method (BEM) [32]. These results are therefore inconsistent by a factor of approximately 2 with those in Table IV and Ref.…”
Section: νββ Decay With Light Neutrino Exchangecontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…More directly, it is also possible to infer the dominant mechanism purely within the context of neutrinoless double beta decay and closely related processes. Relevant techniques discussed in the literature include (i) the comparison of 0νββ decay rates in different isotopes [104][105][106] (this possibility is discussed in detail in the contribution by Fogli et al), (ii) the comparison of 0νβ − β − with 0νβ + β + [107], (iii) the comparison of 0νββ with electron capture [107], (iv) the comparison of of 0νββ decay to the ground state and an excited state [108] and (v) the experimental determination of the angular and energy distribution of the outgoing electrons in 0νββ [4,[109][110][111][112][113][114].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the ratio may be used to identify the process, 22,24,68) provided that both the theoretical calculation and the experimental measurement are made accurately.…”
Section: Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear matrix elements for excited states have been discussed in terms of QRPA. 23,68) The matrix elements are quite sensitive to the nuclear structures and processes. Although the transition rates for excited states are much smaller than the rate for the ground state, the experiment is nearly free of BG's.…”
Section: Nuclear Models For Matrix Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%