2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0146-6410(00)00101-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutrino oscillations and consequences for coupling constants λi33(′) of the R̵-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…R-parity violating terms may induce a Majorana neutrino mass and may, therefore, lead to 0νββ decay. But the relevant masses are small, at least 10 times smaller [55] than those deduced from the present data. The bilinear terms in the superpotential also lead to mixings between the neutrinos and neutralinos as well as between the leptons and the charginos, leading to lepton violating processes [56].…”
Section: The R-parity Violating Contributioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…R-parity violating terms may induce a Majorana neutrino mass and may, therefore, lead to 0νββ decay. But the relevant masses are small, at least 10 times smaller [55] than those deduced from the present data. The bilinear terms in the superpotential also lead to mixings between the neutrinos and neutralinos as well as between the leptons and the charginos, leading to lepton violating processes [56].…”
Section: The R-parity Violating Contributioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…In order to reproduce the experimental results from the solar and atmospheric neutrinos data combination, with three active neutrinos and no sterile neutrino, one must require a large ν µ − ν τ mass hierarchy, m νµ /m ντ = χ ≈ 7 − 40, and a large mixing angle, sin 2 (2θ) > 0.82. The renormalization group evolution produces sneutrino VEVs, General fits to the neutrino oscillation data, using the combined tree and one-loop level contributions, are attempted in several works [235,236,237,238] with the purpose to determining the allowed ranges for the various RPV coupling constants. Haug et al, [236] compare the combined tree and one-loop level contributions from the bilinear interactions and the trilinear interactions, λ i33 , λ ′ i33 , with a phenomenological light neutrinos mass matrix with entries representing upper limits inferred from the oscillation experiments and the ββ 0ν measurements.…”
Section: Combined Bilinear and Trilinear Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The renormalization group evolution produces sneutrino VEVs, General fits to the neutrino oscillation data, using the combined tree and one-loop level contributions, are attempted in several works [235,236,237,238] with the purpose to determining the allowed ranges for the various RPV coupling constants. Haug et al, [236] compare the combined tree and one-loop level contributions from the bilinear interactions and the trilinear interactions, λ i33 , λ ′ i33 , with a phenomenological light neutrinos mass matrix with entries representing upper limits inferred from the oscillation experiments and the ββ 0ν measurements. The subsequent work by Haug et al, [238] examines the compatibility of the LSND data with the three light neutrino generations scenario.…”
Section: Combined Bilinear and Trilinear Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicit flavor models of this type were constructed, for example, in Refs. [26,27,28]. Equation (3.1) holds in these models.…”
Section: Neutrino Masses From Different Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 97%