2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.01.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutrino–antineutrino mass splitting in the Standard Model and baryogenesis

Abstract: On the basis of a previously proposed mechanism of neutrino-antineutrino mass splitting in the Standard Model, which is Lorentz and SU(2) × U (1) invariant but non-local to evade the CPT theorem, we discuss the possible implications of neutrino-antineutrino mass splitting on neutrino physics and baryogenesis. It is shown that non-locality within a distance scale of the Planck length, that may not be fatal to unitarity in a generic effective theory, can generate the neutrino-antineutrino mass splitting of the o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we mention that the relevant mass scale of the neutron oscillation is estimated at ϵ 1 ≤ 6 × 10 −24 eV and n − n mass splitting itself is constrained to be less than 10 −15 eV to observe the oscillation [6]. These values are not much different from the estimated mass difference ∼10 −20 eV of the electron and positron induced by the possible CPT breaking that is required to explain the small (2σ) mass difference of the observed Sun neutrino and reactor antineutrino as really arising from the Lorentz-invariant CPT breaking [16]. See also a recent paper [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, we mention that the relevant mass scale of the neutron oscillation is estimated at ϵ 1 ≤ 6 × 10 −24 eV and n − n mass splitting itself is constrained to be less than 10 −15 eV to observe the oscillation [6]. These values are not much different from the estimated mass difference ∼10 −20 eV of the electron and positron induced by the possible CPT breaking that is required to explain the small (2σ) mass difference of the observed Sun neutrino and reactor antineutrino as really arising from the Lorentz-invariant CPT breaking [16]. See also a recent paper [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The possible CPT violation in the hadron sector appears to be very small as is indicated by both experimental limit jm K − m K j < 0.44 × 10 −18 GeV [15] and a recent model study within an extension of the Standard Model [16]. However, we mention that the relevant mass scale of the neutron oscillation is estimated at ϵ 1 ≤ 6 × 10 −24 eV and n − n mass splitting itself is constrained to be less than 10 −15 eV to observe the oscillation [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In short, we assume that every mass arises from the Higgs doublet, which has been discovered recently. One may add a hermitian non-local Higgs coupling with a real parameter µ to the above Lagrangian [2],…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be interesting to incorporate CPT breaking in the neutrino mass sector of a minimal extension of the Standard Model. We incorporate, a)C, CP and CPT breaking, b)Lorentz invariance, c)SU(2)xU(1) gauge invariance, d)Non-locality within a distance scale of the Planck length, in our model of the neutrino-antineutrino mass splitting [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%