2001
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.75.2.943-951.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutralizing Antibodies in Persistent Borna Disease Virus Infection: Prophylactic Effect of gp94-Specific Monoclonal Antibodies in Preventing Encephalitis

Abstract: Borna disease virus (BDV) infection triggers an immune-mediated encephalomyelitis and results in a persistent infection. The immune response in the acute phase of the disease is characterized by a cellular response in which CD8؉ T cells are responsible for the destruction of virus-infected brain cells. CD4 ؉ T cells function as helper cells and support the production of antiviral antibodies. Antibodies generated in the acute phase of the disease against the nucleoprotein and the phosphoprotein are nonneutraliz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This false conclusion has serious consequences: the misinterpretation of p16 as an N-glycosylated matrix protein, the occurrence of p16 on the virus surface, and the misleading interpretation that antibodies to p16 have neutralizing activity (14,15,(30)(31)(32). A recent publication (11) shows that neutralizing activity for BDV infection was found only with monoclonal antibodies raised against gp94, not with those against p16, which were raised against recombinant BDV proteins. Moreover, previous immunocytochemical investigations which used antibodies directed to carbohydrate-contaminated p16 need to be reexamined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This false conclusion has serious consequences: the misinterpretation of p16 as an N-glycosylated matrix protein, the occurrence of p16 on the virus surface, and the misleading interpretation that antibodies to p16 have neutralizing activity (14,15,(30)(31)(32). A recent publication (11) shows that neutralizing activity for BDV infection was found only with monoclonal antibodies raised against gp94, not with those against p16, which were raised against recombinant BDV proteins. Moreover, previous immunocytochemical investigations which used antibodies directed to carbohydrate-contaminated p16 need to be reexamined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the relevance of neutralizing antibodies is difficult to determine in natural infections, neutralizing antibodies against the major glycoprotein prevent infection and encephalitis in laboratory rats if administered prophylactically (Furrer et al, 2001b), but not if administered simultaneously with the virus (Stitz et al, 1998). Immunosuppressed rats mount a humoral, but not a cellular immune response (Stitz et al, 1998).…”
Section: Infection Kinetics and Diagnosis Of Bdv Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results show that 10 2 FFU of BDV-MDCK induces disease while infection with 10 4 FFU apparently represents a breaking point, where some animals develop disease and others control the virus and do not develop BD. This finding also indicates differences among BDV isolates that possibly depend on their passage history in vitro; BDV has been cultured in MDCK cells for more than 20 years (12), whereas it has been passaged in CRL1405 cells only for a short time (9). Infection of rats with HD BDV-CRL or BDV-MDCK (10 6 FFU) resulted in an early induction of the humoral immune response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Control of a virus infection usually is due to the activity of the humoral and/or cellular arm of the immune system. Only recently has it been demonstrated that neutralizing glycoproteinspecific antibodies can have a prophylactic effect in experimental BD (9). However, apart from the early induction of nonneutralizing antibodies against the nucleoprotein and the phosphoprotein, no neutralizing antibodies were found in sera from BDV-CRL-or BDV-MDCK-infected rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation