Purpose-To describe a modified bell retinoscopy (MBR) method for quantifying accommodative lag in children, and to assess its repeatability and comparability to other techniques.Methods-In MBR, the target is advanced toward the patient until the retinoscopic reflex is neutralized. A "standardized 40 cm target estimate" of lag was derived for each child using data from three retinoscope distances. Within-visit repeatability was assessed in normal children 5-23 months of age, a heterogenous group of clinic patients, and a group of children with Down syndrome. Clinic patients were tested on separate days for between-visit repeatability, and also with Nott retinoscopy (NR) and the monocular estimate method (MEM) on Day 2.Results-MBR correlated with NR (R=0.84) and MEM (R=0.82). MBR and NR estimates were lower than MEM for high lags. Within-visit repeatability of the standardized 40 cm target estimate of MBR in normal children and clinic patients varied with the amount of lag (p<0.0001). The repeatability index (RI) for 0.50 D lag was 0.49 D, and for 1.00 D lag it was 0.80 D. Repeatability was similar in children with Down syndrome. In clinic patients, the between-visit RI for 0.50 D lag was 0.60 D for the second estimate of each day, with lower repeatability for the first measure of each day. Repeatability did not vary with age or refractive error. The decrease in repeatability with high lag may be attributable to spatial measurement error.Conclusions-MBR estimates of accommodative lag correlate with traditional dynamic retinoscopy measures over a wide range of lags, and show comparable repeatability. MBR may be a useful addition to the repertoire of clinical tools available for assessing accommodation in young children.
KeywordsAccommodation; lag of accommodation; retinoscopy; infants; children "Dynamic" retinoscopy techniques quantify accommodative lag by assessing the refractive state of the freely-accommodating eye at a single point in time. Traditional techniques include Nott retinoscopy (NR), 1 the monocular estimate method (MEM) 2 , 3 and bell retinoscopy. 4 Clinical applications of measuring accommodation include optimizing refractive correction in children at risk of accommodative deficits, from Down syndrome, 5 , 6, 7 cerebral palsy, 8,9 or retinal disorders, 10 and evaluating asthenopia and convergence insufficiency. 11 Accommodative deficits may be important to identify in children with amblyopia, 12,13,14,15 since hyperopic or bifocal correction could theoretically enhance treatment in these children. 16,17 Accommodative lag may also help distinguish between well-compensated hyperopes and Dynamic retinoscopy is challenging, however, in young children. With a moving or inattentive child, it is difficult to introduce MEM lenses briefly enough not to influence accommodation. NR, using a fixed target, is inconvenient to perform in a typical clinic setting without an assistant. The examiner's withdrawal can distract the patient, and the retinoscopic reflex seen from a distance becomes hard to judge w...