2022
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00580-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutralisation sensitivity of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron BA.2.75 sublineage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous reports we show that cross-neutralization of Omicron BA.2.75 and BA.4/BA.5 are broadly comparable (10,23,24) indicating factors other than immune evasion to be involved in growth advantage of BA.…”
Section: Main Textsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Consistent with previous reports we show that cross-neutralization of Omicron BA.2.75 and BA.4/BA.5 are broadly comparable (10,23,24) indicating factors other than immune evasion to be involved in growth advantage of BA.…”
Section: Main Textsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The observation that BA.2.75 and BA.4/BA.5 display lower neutralisation sensitivity compared with BA.2 suggests that this trait might enable them to outcompete BA.2 in subpopulations with vaccination or infection-induced immunity. Finally, our data confirm and extend the findings of two recent studies 6,7 and provide evidence that three vaccine doses are required to induce potent neutralising activity against BA.…”
Section: Lung Cell Entry Cell-cell Fusion Capacity and Neutralisation...supporting
confidence: 90%
“…In accordance with all evolutionary theories, often, new SARS-CoV-2 variants will exhibit antibody escape capabilities [ 15 , 16 ], but this is not necessarily strictly related to a high diffusion capability or to the improved pathogenicity of the virus [ 10 ]. According to the currently available data, SARS-CoV-2 BQ.1 appears as a new variant with no enhanced capabilities of infectivity or pathogenicity with respect to its direct progenitor BA.5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%