1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf01068257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutral hydrogen in the vicinity of galactic radio sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting that the systemic velocity for Puppis A of +5 km s −1 reported by Gosachinskij & Khersonskij (1985) is in close agreement with that of +7.6 km s −1 reported here. Nevertheless, the clearly defined H i envelope in fig. A12 of Gosachinskij & Khersonskij (1985) giving an expansion velocity of 8 km s −1 has not been reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is interesting that the systemic velocity for Puppis A of +5 km s −1 reported by Gosachinskij & Khersonskij (1985) is in close agreement with that of +7.6 km s −1 reported here. Nevertheless, the clearly defined H i envelope in fig. A12 of Gosachinskij & Khersonskij (1985) giving an expansion velocity of 8 km s −1 has not been reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Gosachinskij & Khersonskij (1985) identified an H i envelope around Puppis A from data with a velocity resolution of 6.3 km s −1 . The velocity centre of this H i hole is at +5 km s −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The anomalously high kinetic energy of some HI shells surrounding classical supernova remnants (see, e.g., Gosachinskij and Khersonskij (1985), Gosachinskij (2005), and references therein) do not provide unequivocal evidence for a hypernova explosion either. First, the wind from the supernova progenitor and/or the stars of the host OB association is an obvious energy source of the outer H I shell.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anomalously high kinetic energy of some HI shells surrounding classical supernova remnants (see, e.g., Gosachinskij and Khersonskij (1985), Gosachinskij (2005), and references therein) do not provide unequivocal evidence for a hypernova explosion either. First, the wind from the supernova progenitor and/or the stars of the host OB association is an obvious energy source of the outer HI shell.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%