1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.034-az0057.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurotoxicity after spinal anaesthesia induced by serial intrathecal injections of magnesium sulphate  An experimental study in a rat model

Abstract: SummaryWe have previously demonstrated in a rat model that the lumbar intrathecal injection of 0.02 ml 6.3% magnesium sulphate, a concentration iso-osmolar with rat plasma, produces a state of spinal anaesthesia and general sedation which reversed completely after 6 h, without evidence of neurotoxicity, immediately or during the week thereafter. Using the same model and five groups of six animals in each, we administered the same volume and concentration of magnesium sulphate and compared its clinical effects … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have found magnesium to be safe in intrathecal and epidural blockades. Chanimov et al 13 showed that intrathecal injection of 6.3% magnesium sulphate 0.02 mL (4.6 mgÁkg -1 ) did not cause neurotoxicity, while 12.6% magnesium sulphate 0.02 mL (9.2 mgÁkg -1 ) caused moderate vacuolation and severe histopathological demyelinization. Another report 14 described that the inadvertent epidural injection of larger doses (8.7 g, 9.6 g) of magnesium sulphate did not cause neurologic toxicity in pregnant woman.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have found magnesium to be safe in intrathecal and epidural blockades. Chanimov et al 13 showed that intrathecal injection of 6.3% magnesium sulphate 0.02 mL (4.6 mgÁkg -1 ) did not cause neurotoxicity, while 12.6% magnesium sulphate 0.02 mL (9.2 mgÁkg -1 ) caused moderate vacuolation and severe histopathological demyelinization. Another report 14 described that the inadvertent epidural injection of larger doses (8.7 g, 9.6 g) of magnesium sulphate did not cause neurologic toxicity in pregnant woman.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results show that intrathecally administered magnesium sulphate has little effect on electrolyte homeostasis. The increasing interest in magnesium as a physiological N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist and its role in a variety of clinically important disorders characterised by intracellular calcium excess and magnesium deficiency [1][2][3][4][5] has prompted us to investigate the use of intrathecal magnesium sulphate in an experimental animal model.We have previously shown that when injected intrathecally in a rat model, magnesium sulphate, in a concentration iso-osmolar with rat plasma, will produce a state of segmental spinal anaesthesia which is both completely reversible and free of neurotoxic side-effects [6,7]. However, the same volume and concentration which resulted in spinal anaesthesia, when injected intravenously, did not produce general anaesthesia sufficient for a laparotomy procedure to be carried out painlessly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously shown that when injected intrathecally in a rat model, magnesium sulphate, in a concentration iso-osmolar with rat plasma, will produce a state of segmental spinal anaesthesia which is both completely reversible and free of neurotoxic side-effects [6,7]. However, the same volume and concentration which resulted in spinal anaesthesia, when injected intravenously, did not produce general anaesthesia sufficient for a laparotomy procedure to be carried out painlessly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrathecal administration of magnesium sulphate (MgSO 4 ) has recently been shown to produce spinal anaesthesia [1][2][3]. Using the tail-pinch method, we have reported that intrathecal administration of MgSO 4 did not induce complete analgesia in the presence of motor paralysis [4] although differentiation of analgesia from motor paralysis may be difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%