Neuroticism and common mental disorders: Meaning and utility of a complex relationship

Abstract

Neuroticism's prospective association with common mental disorders (CMDs) has fueled the assumption that neuroticism is an independent etiologically informative risk factor. This vulnerability model postulates that neuroticism sets in motion processes that lead to CMDs. However, four other models seek to explain the association, including the spectrum model (manifestations of the same process), common cause model (shared determinants), state and scar models (CMD episode adds temporary / permanent neuroticism). To examine their validity we reviewed literature on confounding, operational overlap, stability and change, determinants, and treatment effects. None of the models is able to account for (virtually) all findings. The state and scar model cannot explain the prospective association. The spectrum model has some relevance, especially for internalizing disorders. Common causes are most important but the vulnerability model cannot be excluded although confounding of the prospective association by baseline symptoms and psychiatric history is substantial. In fact, some of the findings, such as interactions with stress and the small decay of neuroticism's effect over time, are consistent with the vulnerability model. We describe research designs that discriminate the remaining models and plea for deconstruction of neuroticism. Neuroticism is etiologically not informative yet but useful as an efficient marker of non-specified general risk.

Making connections: exploring the centrality of posttraumatic stress symptoms and covariates after a terrorist attack

“…One explanation for this may be that neuroticism may act as a confounding factor that is connected with all the symptoms (Engelhard, Hout, & Lommen, 2009; Ormel et al, 2013). Another possibility is that what we term "neuroticism" may not reflect an underlying latent separate entity at all, but rather a network of affective, cognitive, and behavioural components that interact (Cramer et al, 2012).…”

“…Among the well-known risk factors or covariates of posttraumatic stress are high severity of exposure (Santiago et al, 2013), being female (Olff, Langeland, Draijer, & Gersons, 2007), low levels of social support (Charuvastra & Cloitre, 2008; Ozer, Best, Lipsey, & Weiss, 2003), and high neuroticism (Ormel et al, 2013). Despite the numerous studies that have investigated these factors as predictors of posttraumatic stress, few have examined why or how they lead to the development of posttraumatic stress symptomatology.…”

Personality traits and common psychiatric conditions in patients with seborrheic dermatitis

“…The strongest and most unique predictor of common psychiatric disorders is neuroticism, which plays an important role in persistent, low subjective well being and psychological stress-linked physical health problems 24 .…”

Connectomics and Neuroticism: An Altered Functional Network Organization

“…Neuroticism is a fundamental part of various widely accepted personality taxonomies (Costa and McCrae, 1992;Eysenck, 1967;Gray, 1991) and is a highly efficient marker of risk for psychopathology, specifically depression and anxiety disorders (Lahey, 2009;Ormel et al, 2013b). High compared with low neurotic individuals tend to interpret events as more threatening ('negativity bias'), react more emotionally to negative events and apply maladaptive coping strategies in the face of stressors (Suls and Martin, 2005;Watson et al, 1994).…”