Neuroscience, Modularity and Personality Theory: Conceptual Foundations of a Model of Complex Human Functioning

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to lay the groundwork for the development of a scientific theory of complex human functioning. We first discuss the assumptions on which our thinking is based, then advance the argument that behavior, and human activity in general, may be more fully understood in light of current data on the structural organization of the central nervous system. The brain is organized as a modular, distributed, self-organizing system, which is in constant transaction with the environment. Because of its plasticity, structural and functional change occurs in the brain as a result of experience throughout life. It is our thesis that complex human behavior is organized in a similar manner - that is, human personality and behavior manifest themselves as modular systems. The insights provided by an understanding of the relationship of brain and behavior may enhance the capacity to explain both normal and pathological personality functioning.

Disturbance of neuronal plasticity is a critical pathogenetic event in Alzheimer's disease

“…Thus, the mental function has, as its cerebral basis, a specific dynamic structure. It is the combination of flexible and rigid connections that the cerebral organization of mental activity is based upon (Grigsby and Schneiders, 1991;Ivantskii, 1994). While the presence of rigid connections ensures the stability of the principle characteristics of functions, the variable configuration of the flexible connections determines the unique, nonrepeatable character of an experienced mental act (Ivantskii, 1994).…”

Moments of Meeting: The Relevance of Lou Sander's and Dan Stern's Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Development of Pathological Social Relatedness

“…Numerous case reports have described children who had experienced traumatic events in infancy or early toddlerhood and who reenacted specific elements of their trauma months and even years after the event (Gaensbauer, , , ; Paley & Alpert, ; Terr, , ). Such reenactment behavior often appears to be initiated spontaneously when the child is exposed to a stimulus reminder, as if the trauma has generated a relational script or procedural knowing (Grigsby & Schneiders, ) that is ready to be activated by any appropriate trigger (Gaensbauer, ). More than rote imitation, these reenactments, although not absolutely veridical, have reflected holistic and multimodal assimilations of the goals behind the observed actions, the sensory experiences associated with the actions, and the subjective states of the person(s) whom the children had observed ( Braten, ; Gaensbauer, , , ).…”

Infancy research, infant mental health, and adult psychotherapy: Mutual influences

“…Models of nonverbal patternings of behavior and interpersonal experience are increasingly at the core of accounts of personality development and psychopathogenesis. For example, the important concepts of implicit, or procedural, knowledge and memories (Grigsby & Schneiders, 1991; Kihlstrom, 1987) are now being added to the interpersonal‐affective domain. Procedural knowledge does not involve reflective awareness but instead has to do with action or affect schemas encoded and recalled in the body and emotions, such as those used in riding a bicycle, driving a car , or reacting to certain interpersonal stimuli in particular ways.…”