2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-017-9924-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropsychology and the Criminal Responsibility of Psychopaths: Reconsidering the Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The law uses higher-order constructs such as 'justice', 'social dangerousness' or 'responsibility' that apply to the level of a person, while neuroscientists talk about neurons and neural networks that are described in biochemical and mechanistic terms (Campbell & Eastman, 2014). Often, it is not clear how constructs from one level or domain should be translated and implemented in the other (Buckholtz & Faigman, 2014;Jurjako & Malatesti, 2017). Thus, often the correlation of biomarkers with some behaviors has not clear implications for higherorder legal constructs.…”
Section: Ethical Concerns About the Bioprediction Of Antisocial Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The law uses higher-order constructs such as 'justice', 'social dangerousness' or 'responsibility' that apply to the level of a person, while neuroscientists talk about neurons and neural networks that are described in biochemical and mechanistic terms (Campbell & Eastman, 2014). Often, it is not clear how constructs from one level or domain should be translated and implemented in the other (Buckholtz & Faigman, 2014;Jurjako & Malatesti, 2017). Thus, often the correlation of biomarkers with some behaviors has not clear implications for higherorder legal constructs.…”
Section: Ethical Concerns About the Bioprediction Of Antisocial Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not because biomarkers associated with psychopathic and antisocial traits are essential or immutable. But because our moral and legal practices would treat such persons as choosing behaviors and ways of life (Jurjako & Malatesti, 2017) that cause in others understandable and justifiable attitudes of fear and a preference for social distance, which are often used in the operationalization of stigma (Haslam, 2014). Thus, due to their criminal and non-cooperative behavior, certain discriminatory reactions, such as restrictions of freedom and opportunities and compulsory forms of rehabilitative therapy, would be sanctioned by the law or morality (for a more detailed discussion of this issue, see Baccarini & Malatesti, 2017).…”
Section: Biomarkers and Opportunities For Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hicks and Drislane 2018) with varying underlying etiologies (e.g. Jurjako and Malatesti 2018;Stratton, Kiehl, and Hanlon 2015).…”
Section: The Psychopathy Diagnosis and Its Forensic Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, there is evidence that psychopaths may be able to appropriately adjust their top-down attention to better recognize and respond to affective cues (Koenigs and Newman 2013). In a recent article, Jurjako and Malatesti argue that although psychopaths seem to have trouble with cognitive tasks involving emotions, such as passive avoidance, response-reversal, and gambling tasks, the deficits are highly context dependent (Jurjako and Malatesti 2018a). When psychopaths are attentive to their goals on a passive-avoidance task, they score similarly to controls (Koenigs and Newman 2013).…”
Section: Affective Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 99%