Neuropsychological functioning in children and adolescents with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis (anti-NMDARE)

Hageboutros, Karine; Thomas, Nina H.; Hutchinson, Melissa; Banwell, Brenda; Baum, Katherine T.

doi:10.1007/s00415-022-11372-9

Cited by 2 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…29 Attention/Working Memory Simple auditory attention span (short-term memory)/ working memory was most often assessed using a digit span task, of which 3/5 demonstrated worse forward, 5/5 showed worse backward, and 1/1 showed worse total scores in patients relative to controls, [24][25][26]28,[32][33][34] while impairment rates varied from 0-38.5%. 14,15,30,31 Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) performance was worse among patients relative to controls in 1 study. 27 Visual attention/working memory was most often assessed using a block tapping (or similar) test, with variable results (1/ 3 worse compared with controls or normative data, 0%-29% impairment).…”

Section: Anti-nmda-r Ae Verbal Memorymentioning

confidence: 76%

“…List learning tasks were the most used verbal memory measures, with worse performance in patients compared with controls and/or normative data or ≥25% normative impairment in 7/10 for immediate and delayed recall each and 2/2 for recognition. 15,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Story and verbal pair recall tasks were used in 2 and 1 study each, all of which showed worse performance than controls or normative data in immediate and delayed recall. 31,32 Visual Memory…”

Section: Anti-nmda-r Ae Verbal Memorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…15,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] Story and verbal pair recall tasks were used in 2 and 1 study each, all of which showed worse performance than controls or normative data in immediate and delayed recall. 31,32 Visual Memory…”

Section: Anti-nmda-r Ae Verbal Memorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[24][25][26]28,32,35 Symbol search scores were not different between patients and normative data in 1 study, although 40% of the sample demonstrated impairment. 31…”

Section: Anti-nmda-r Ae Verbal Memorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Semantic fluency was the most used language measure, with patients performing worse than controls or normative data in half the studies (0%-25% impairment). 14,15,25,28,[30][31][32][33]35 Phonemic fluency was also commonly examined, with worse performance compared with normative data or controls was observed in 2/3 studies (0%-38% impairment). 2,14,15,[29][30][31][32]35 Naming was assessed in 5 studies, with worse performance compared with controls or normative data in only 1 of 3 (14%-25% impairment).…”

Section: Languagementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Neuropsychological Testing in Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Scoping Review

2024

Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and ObjectivesIdentifying optimal methods for evaluation and monitoring of cognitive outcomes in AE is important for clinical care and research. This scoping review aimed to evaluate neuropsychological tests (NPT) that are most frequently impaired in AE cohorts to provide recommendations for a standardized NPT battery for AE outcome. MethodsPubMed search for studies examining NPT in patients with AE was conducted on June 9, 2023. Studies were screened for inclusion/exclusion criteria as follows: at least 1 NPT, individual NPT test scores with comparison with healthy controls or normative data and neural-IgG status, total sample size ≥5, and English manuscript available. ResultsThe search yielded 5,393 studies, of which 3,359 were screened, 107 were full text reviewed, and 32 met inclusion/exclusion criteria, anti-NMDA-R (k = 18), anti-LGI1 (k = 10), anti-GABA B -R (k = 2), anti-GAD-65 (k = 4), and anti-CASPR2 (k = 3). The cognitive domains most frequently impaired were visual and verbal episodic memory, attention/working memory, processing speed, and aspects of executive functions. DiscussionGiven the dearth of literature examining NPT in AE in combination with small sample sizes and methodological differences, more research in this area is needed. However, we provide recommendations for a test battery to be used in future studies, with the aim of standardizing research in this area. Based on the available literature, we recommend the use of comprehensive NPT batteries, spanning all cognitive domains. The highest yield measures may include the tests of (1) visual and verbal learning/memory, (2) basic and sustained attention, (3) processing speed, and (4) executive functions.

show abstract

Section: Anti-nmda-r Ae Verbal Memorymentioning

confidence: 76%

Section: Anti-nmda-r Ae Verbal Memorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Anti-nmda-r Ae Verbal Memorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[24][25][26]28,32,35 Symbol search scores were not different between patients and normative data in 1 study, although 40% of the sample demonstrated impairment. 31…”

Section: Anti-nmda-r Ae Verbal Memorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Languagementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Neuropsychological Testing in Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Scoping Review

2024

Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Neuropsychological Testing in Autoimmune Encephalitis

Galioto,

Grezmak,

Swetlik

et al. 2024

Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and ObjectivesIdentifying optimal methods for evaluation and monitoring of cognitive outcomes in AE is important for clinical care and research. This scoping review aimed to evaluate neuropsychological tests (NPT) that are most frequently impaired in AE cohorts to provide recommendations for a standardized NPT battery for AE outcome.MethodsPubMed search for studies examining NPT in patients with AE was conducted on June 9, 2023. Studies were screened for inclusion/exclusion criteria as follows: at least 1 NPT, individual NPT test scores with comparison with healthy controls or normative data and neural-IgG status, total sample size ≥5, and English manuscript available.ResultsThe search yielded 5,393 studies, of which 3,359 were screened, 107 were full text reviewed, and 32 met inclusion/exclusion criteria, anti-NMDA-R (k = 18), anti-LGI1 (k = 10), anti-GABAB-R (k = 2), anti-GAD-65 (k = 4), and anti-CASPR2 (k = 3). The cognitive domains most frequently impaired were visual and verbal episodic memory, attention/working memory, processing speed, and aspects of executive functions.DiscussionGiven the dearth of literature examining NPT in AE in combination with small sample sizes and methodological differences, more research in this area is needed. However, we provide recommendations for a test battery to be used in future studies, with the aim of standardizing research in this area. Based on the available literature, we recommend the use of comprehensive NPT batteries, spanning all cognitive domains. The highest yield measures may include the tests of (1) visual and verbal learning/memory, (2) basic and sustained attention, (3) processing speed, and (4) executive functions.

show abstract

Neuropsychological functioning in children and adolescents with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis (anti-NMDARE)

Cited by 2 publications

References 28 publications

Neuropsychological Testing in Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Scoping Review

Neuropsychological Testing in Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Scoping Review

Neuropsychological Testing in Autoimmune Encephalitis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About