1990
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1781(90)90104-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropsychological deficit in schizophrenic subtypes: Paranoid, nonparanoid, and schizoaffective subgroups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
36
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the present study are in agreement with the majority of the current lit erature reporting similar deviations of schizo phrenic probands as compared to the achieve ments of healthy controls on the WCST, TMT [31][32][33] and VFT [16. 30].…”
Section: Comparison Between Schizophrenics and Controlssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The findings of the present study are in agreement with the majority of the current lit erature reporting similar deviations of schizo phrenic probands as compared to the achieve ments of healthy controls on the WCST, TMT [31][32][33] and VFT [16. 30].…”
Section: Comparison Between Schizophrenics and Controlssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Likewise, Bornstein et al [57] found a higher fluidity of speech in paranoid than in non-paranoid and schizoaffective schizophrenics, but this difference also disappeared after controlling for group differences regarding education, medication and number of psychopathological symptoms. No group differences between paranoid and non-paranoid patients were found for expressive speech or language-related receptive abilities [58,59] .…”
Section: Neuropsychological Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the problem of inclusion and exclusion criteria, Sorensen et al [65] pointed out that these factors may artificially increase or decrease the number of paranoid or non-paranoid test subjects, thereby also skewing the test data for group comparisons. Bornstein et al [57] also showed that between-group differences in cognitive performance could be due to confounding variables (see above). Finally, Kremen et al [56] emphasized the importance of qualitative and quantitative aspects of delusions, an approach which seems promising, given that considering disorder-related characteristics across the various classifications had already been proposed by Bilder et al [61] and Liddle et al [63] .…”
Section: Neuropsychological Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inferences with regard to neuropsychological aspects of delusions have mostly been made from comparisons between patients with paranoid versus nonparanoid schizophrenia [[5,6,7,8,9], for a review, see [10]]. However, one must wonder to what extent these conclusions from studies in schizophrenia can be accepted for patients with DD given that, by definition, delusions are supposed to be different in DD and schizophrenia (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%