2021
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropsychologic Profiles and Cerebral Glucose Metabolism in Neurocognitive Long COVID Syndrome

Abstract: During the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Long COVID-syndrome, which impairs patients through cognitive deficits, fatigue, and exhaustion, has become increasingly relevant. Its underlying pathophysiology, however, is unknown. In this study, we assessed cognitive profiles and regional cerebral glucose metabolism as a biomarker of neuronal function in outpatients suffering from long-term neurocognitive symptoms after COVID-19.Methods: Outpatients seeking neurological counseling with neurocognitiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
77
2
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(94 reference statements)
5
77
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding largely confirms the topography of brain hypometabolism in patients with post-COVID-19 with persistent hyposmia or with other functional complaints [41]. Lastly, Dressing et al [43] assessed cognitive profiles and regional cerebral glucose metabolism as a biomarker of neuronal function in outpatients suffering from long-term neurocognitive symptoms after COVID-19. Patients with long-term symptoms (202 ± 58 days after positive PCR) were assessed with a neuropsychological test battery and cerebral 18 F-FDG PET imaging was performed in a subset of the patients.…”
Section: F-fdg-pet/ct and Brain Metabolism Changes In Post-covid-19 Patientsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding largely confirms the topography of brain hypometabolism in patients with post-COVID-19 with persistent hyposmia or with other functional complaints [41]. Lastly, Dressing et al [43] assessed cognitive profiles and regional cerebral glucose metabolism as a biomarker of neuronal function in outpatients suffering from long-term neurocognitive symptoms after COVID-19. Patients with long-term symptoms (202 ± 58 days after positive PCR) were assessed with a neuropsychological test battery and cerebral 18 F-FDG PET imaging was performed in a subset of the patients.…”
Section: F-fdg-pet/ct and Brain Metabolism Changes In Post-covid-19 Patientsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Some studies (summarized in Table 1) have shown that Post-COVID-19 patients with persistent functional symptoms and complaints demonstrate continuous 18 F-FDG-PET hypometabolism in various brain regions [37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Reduced metabolic activity in the orbitofrontal cortex in COVID-19 anosmia was found by Karimi-Galougahi et al [37], which might suggest that impaired neural function of this region might be a causative mechanism for anosmia, likely due to direct neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2 [39].…”
Section: F-fdg-pet/ct and Brain Metabolism Changes In Post-covid-19 Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Hosp et al., 15 neurological symptoms and executive deficits correlated with frontoparietal hypometabolism in fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)–positron emission tomography (PET). Conversely, a recent cohort study 30 in patients (n = 31) in the long‐term phase after COVID‐19 (202 ± 58 days after positive PCR) with self‐reported symptoms of Long COVID showed minor cognitive impairments only on the single‐patient level. In contrast, cerebral F‐FDG‐PET failed to reveal a distinct pathological signature; however, a high prevalence of fatigue was found in the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The quality of case‐control and cohort studies was assessed judging three categories: the selection of the study groups, the comparability of the groups; and the ascertainment of either the exposure or outcome of interest for case‐control or cohort studies, respectively. In summary, when using the Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ) threshold standards, 9 of the 20 studies were good, 15,23,25,27,29,32,33,36,31 1 was fair, 28 and 10 were poor 10–12,14,16,24,30,34,35,37 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation