2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropsychologic assessment in collaborative Parkinson's disease research: A proposal from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Morris K. Udall Centers of Excellence for Parkinson's Disease Research at the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Washington

Abstract: Cognitive impairment (CI) and behavioral disturbances can be the earliest symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD), ultimately afflict the vast majority of PD patients, and increase caregiver burden. Our two Morris K. Udall Centers of Excellence for Parkinson’s Disease Research were supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) to recommend a comprehensive yet practical approach to cognitive and behavioral assessment to fuel collaborative research. We recommend a step-wise approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

8
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the neuropsychological tests used to represent function within cognitive domains vary across studies, and the tests utilized here differ from some previous research. The measures chosen in this study and their assignment to specific cognitive domains were based on recently published consensus guidelines designed to harmonize neuropsychological assessment across the PANUC Clinical Consortium [12], but it should be recognized that a given test does not necessarily assess only the assigned cognitive domain. Third, medications were not included as a covariate in the adjusted models, though they may impact both cognition and PIGD symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the neuropsychological tests used to represent function within cognitive domains vary across studies, and the tests utilized here differ from some previous research. The measures chosen in this study and their assignment to specific cognitive domains were based on recently published consensus guidelines designed to harmonize neuropsychological assessment across the PANUC Clinical Consortium [12], but it should be recognized that a given test does not necessarily assess only the assigned cognitive domain. Third, medications were not included as a covariate in the adjusted models, though they may impact both cognition and PIGD symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants completed a comprehensive cognitive assessment based on published consensus guidelines [12]. We selected tests common to all study sites to assess global cognition as well as specific cognitive domains.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following recently published consensus guidelines [8], GS participants underwent comprehensive cognitive examination at baseline and follow-up visits; MS participants were given additional tests to provide a more robust characterization of cognitive function, although these were not necessarily used for diagnostic purposes. Specific test details are provided in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neuropsychological assessment was previously described as part of the recommended standard battery of cognitive tests for patients with PD enrolled in cognitive research studies at Udall Centers. 19 Specific cognitive tests were as follows: global cognitive abilities, DRS-2; executive abilities/ working memory, Letter-Number Sequencing and phonemic verbal fluency (FAS); memory, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R); visuospatial function, Judgment of Line Orientation; and language, the short Boston Naming Test (BNT) and semantic verbal fluency (animals). For all tests, published norms were used to generate standardized scores.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%