1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb16633.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroprotective properties of lifarizine compared with those of other agents in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischaemia

Abstract: 5 Agents with other mechanisms of action were also shown to have significant neuroprotection in this model. The non-competitive NMDA antagonist, MK 801, showed significant neuroprotection in the model when given at 0.5 mg kg-', i.p. 30 min pre-ischaemia with t.i.d. dosing for 7 days (P< 0.001). The dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, nimodipine was not protective when given using the same dosing protocol as MK 801, 0.5 mg kg-' 30 min pre-occlusion and three times daily for 7 days but showed significant protect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Mex is already used in the clinic (Johansson et al, 1984), a short therapeutic window, as observed in the second series of animals, may limit its application in the treatment of stroke. Our results are consistent with the limited therapeutic windows of other voltagedependent Na ϩ channel blockers, such as BW619C89, tetrodotoxin, and lifarizine, and perhaps suggest that combining Mex with other neuroprotective agents may be necessary for establishing an extended therapeutic window (Granam et al, 1994;Xie et al, 1994;Brown et al, 1995;Chen et al, 1995;Pringle et al, 1997). It is also possible that the therapeutic window for Mex may be better than observed here, since we gave it as only one acute dose to counteract a severe permanent MCA occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Although Mex is already used in the clinic (Johansson et al, 1984), a short therapeutic window, as observed in the second series of animals, may limit its application in the treatment of stroke. Our results are consistent with the limited therapeutic windows of other voltagedependent Na ϩ channel blockers, such as BW619C89, tetrodotoxin, and lifarizine, and perhaps suggest that combining Mex with other neuroprotective agents may be necessary for establishing an extended therapeutic window (Granam et al, 1994;Xie et al, 1994;Brown et al, 1995;Chen et al, 1995;Pringle et al, 1997). It is also possible that the therapeutic window for Mex may be better than observed here, since we gave it as only one acute dose to counteract a severe permanent MCA occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The neuroprotective profile of the diphenylpiperazine derivative, lifarizine (RS-87476; 1-[(2-(4-methylphenyl)-5-methyl)-1H-imidazol-4-yl-methyl]-4-diphenylmethyl-piperazine) has been shown to be neuroprotective in both global and focal models of cerebral ischaemia: the rat 4VO model (Alps et al, 1990); gerbil unilateral carotid artery occlusion (Brown et al, 1993); rat rose Bengal photochemical lesion (McBean et al, 1995b); and mouse middle cerebral artery occlusion (Brown et al, 1994). This neuroprotective efficacy led to the compound being tested in the cat permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion model by magnetic resonance imaging as well as histopathological techniques (Kucharczyk et al, 1991).…”
Section: Neuropathological Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment with MCAO is employed to make an animal model of transient focal cerebral ischemia (Brown et al, 1995;Sydserff et al, 2002). In the present study, a short (2 h) MCAO produced small to mid-sized infarcted regions with increasing post-operative days in the caudate putamen and cerebral cortex, when compared with the usual MCAO method (4 h) (Mishima et al, 2003) (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%