Neurophysiology of human touch and eye gaze in therapeutic relationships and healing: a scoping review

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of this scoping review was to examine and map the range of neurophysiological impacts of human touch and eye gaze, and consider their potential relevance to the therapeutic relationship and to healing. Introduction: Clinicians, and many patients and their relatives, have no doubt as to the efficacy of a positive therapeutic relationship; however, much evidence is based on self-reporting by the patient or observation by the researcher. There has been little formal exploration into what is happening in the body to elicit efficacious reactions in patients. There is, however, a growing body of work on the neurophysiological impact of human interaction. Physical touch and face-to-face interaction are two central elements of this interaction that produce neurophysiological effects on the body. Inclusion criteria: This scoping review considered studies that included cognitively intact human subjects in any setting. This review investigated the neurophysiology of human interaction including touch and eye gaze. It considered studies that have examined, in a variety of settings, the neurophysiological impacts of touch and eye gaze. Quantitative studies were included as the aim was to examine objective measures of neurophysiological changes as a result of human touch and gaze. Methods: An extensive search of multiple databases was undertaken to identify published research in the English language with no date restriction. Data extraction was undertaken using an extraction tool developed specifically for the scoping review objectives. Results: The results of the review are presented in narrative form supported by tables and concept maps. Sixty-four studies were included and the majority were related to touch with various types of massage predominating. Only seven studies investigated gaze with three of these utilizing both touch and gaze. Interventions were delivered by a variety of providers including nurses, significant others and masseuses. The main neurophysiological measures were cortisol, oxytocin and noradrenaline. Conclusions: The aim of this review was to map the neurophysiological impact of human touch and gaze. Although our interest was in studies that might have implications for the therapeutic relationship, we accepted studies that explored phenomena outside of the context of a nurse-patient relationship. This allowed exploration of the boundary of what might be relevant in any therapeutic relationship. Indeed, only a small number of studies included in the review involved clinicians (all nurses) and patients. There was sufficient consistency in trends evident across many studies in regard to the beneficial impact of touch and eye gaze to warrant further investigation in the clinical setting. There is a balance between tightly controlled studies conducted in an artificial (laboratory) setting and/or usi...

Understanding Physicians’ Preferences for Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study

“…Most past research has focused on patient preference and outcomes of care [9,12,[16][17][18][19][20][21] rather than provider inclination. Studies suggest that telemedicine has been accepted more by patients than by providers [22], with providers citing technological barriers to care provision [13,[23][24][25]. Interestingly, the most commonly cited reason for not continuing use among our cohort, as revealed in the open-ended question responses, was lack of fundamental patient interaction required for health care, such as vitals and certain physical exams.…”

“…In medicine, providers pride themselves on creating therapeutic relationships based on sitting in the same room with a person. Although there is an intuitive feeling of what a therapeutic relationship feels like, few studies have examined whether and how physical senses (eg, touch or eye gaze) enhance the therapeutic relationship [25]. Without the ability to interact with a patient physically and apply their nuanced senses, physicians in our cohort were less likely to prefer telemedicine as compared to in-person patient interactions.…”

Years of life lost due to the psychosocial consequences of COVID-19 mitigation strategies based on Swiss data

“…These adverse effects can be intuitively anticipated, but have never been rigorously modeled [4]. Negative mental health outcomes can be attributed to the emotional and physiological effects of the risk posed by the virus and by reduced physical activity, social interaction, and human physical contact [5][6][7]. Studies on prior pandemics, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), found that the length of quarantine was an important predictor of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety, with a cumulative prevalence exceeding 30% of the population [8,9].…”

Links Between the Neurobiology of Oxytocin and Human Musicality

“…Plasma and/or salivary oxytocin levels rise postpartum when mothers interact and bond with their infants (Matthiesen et al, 2001 ; Feldman et al, 2007 ; Feldman, 2012 ; Gordon et al, 2010 ). These interactive behaviors include gaze, facial expression, vocalizing using the preverbal maternal-infant communication known as “motherese,” affectionate touch, and so on (Kerr et al, 2019 ). The increase in serum oxytocin when mothers interact and bond with their own smiling/happy infants is higher in mothers rated as having “secure” attachment to their offspring (Strathearn et al, 2009 ) and with a sensitive temperament (Strathearn et al, 2012 ).…”