Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Image content is prioritized in the visual system. Faces are a paradigmatic example, receiving preferential processing along the visual pathway compared to other visual stimuli. Moreover, face prioritization manifests also in behavior. People tend to look at faces more frequently and for longer periods, and saccadic reaction times can be faster when targeting a face as opposed to a phase-scrambled control. However, it is currently not clear at which stage image content affects oculomotor planning and execution. It can be hypothesized that image content directly influences oculomotor signal generation. Alternatively, the image content could exert its influence on oculomotor planning and execution at a later stage, after the image has been processed. Here we aim to disentangle these two alternative hypotheses by measuring the frequency of saccades toward a visual target when the latter is followed by a visual transient in the central visual field. Behaviorally, this paradigm leads to a reduction in saccade frequency that happens about 90 ms after any visual transient event, also known as saccadic “inhibition”. In two experiments, we measured occurrence of saccades in visually guided saccades as well as microsaccades during fixation, using face and noise-matched visual stimuli. We observed that while the reduction in saccade occurrence was similar for both stimulus types, face stimuli lead to a prolonged reduction in eye movements. Moreover, saccade kinematics were altered by both stimulus types, showing an amplitude reduction without change in peak velocity for the earliest saccades. Taken together, our experiments imply that face stimuli primarily affect the later stages of the behavioral phenomenon of saccadic “inhibition”. We propose that while some stimulus features are processed at an early stage and can quickly influence eye movements, a delayed signal conveying image content information is necessary to further inhibit/delay activity in the oculomotor system to trigger eye movements.
Image content is prioritized in the visual system. Faces are a paradigmatic example, receiving preferential processing along the visual pathway compared to other visual stimuli. Moreover, face prioritization manifests also in behavior. People tend to look at faces more frequently and for longer periods, and saccadic reaction times can be faster when targeting a face as opposed to a phase-scrambled control. However, it is currently not clear at which stage image content affects oculomotor planning and execution. It can be hypothesized that image content directly influences oculomotor signal generation. Alternatively, the image content could exert its influence on oculomotor planning and execution at a later stage, after the image has been processed. Here we aim to disentangle these two alternative hypotheses by measuring the frequency of saccades toward a visual target when the latter is followed by a visual transient in the central visual field. Behaviorally, this paradigm leads to a reduction in saccade frequency that happens about 90 ms after any visual transient event, also known as saccadic “inhibition”. In two experiments, we measured occurrence of saccades in visually guided saccades as well as microsaccades during fixation, using face and noise-matched visual stimuli. We observed that while the reduction in saccade occurrence was similar for both stimulus types, face stimuli lead to a prolonged reduction in eye movements. Moreover, saccade kinematics were altered by both stimulus types, showing an amplitude reduction without change in peak velocity for the earliest saccades. Taken together, our experiments imply that face stimuli primarily affect the later stages of the behavioral phenomenon of saccadic “inhibition”. We propose that while some stimulus features are processed at an early stage and can quickly influence eye movements, a delayed signal conveying image content information is necessary to further inhibit/delay activity in the oculomotor system to trigger eye movements.
At the turn of the 20th century, Henri Poincaré explained that geometry is a convention and that the properties of space and time are the properties of our measuring instruments. Intriguingly, numerous contemporary authors argue that space, time and even number are “encoded” within the brain, as a consequence of evolution, adaptation and natural selection. In the neuroscientific study of movement generation, the activity of neurons would “encode” kinematic parameters: when they emit action potentials, neurons would “speak” a language carrying notions of classical mechanics. In this article, we shall explain that the movement of a body segment is the ultimate product of a measurement, a filtered numerical outcome of multiple processes taking place in parallel in the central nervous system and converging on the groups of neurons responsible for muscle contractions. The fact that notions of classical mechanics efficiently describe movements does not imply their implementation in the inner workings of the brain. Their relevance to the question how the brain activity enables one to produce accurate movements is questioned within the framework of the neurophysiology of orienting gaze movements toward a visual target.
Purpose Post-saccadic oscillations (PSOs) reflect movements of gaze that result from motion of the pupil and lens relative to the eyeball rather than eyeball rotations. Here, we analyzed the characteristics of PSOs in subjects with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and normal vision (NV). Our aim was to assess the differences in PSOs between people with vision loss and healthy controls because PSOs affect retinal image stability after each saccade. Methods Participants completed a horizontal saccade task and their gaze was measured using a pupil-based eye tracker. Oscillations occurring in the 80 to 200 ms post-saccadic period were described with a damped oscillation model. We compared the amplitude, decay time constant, and frequency of the PSOs for the three different groups. We also examined the correlation between these PSO parameters and the amplitude, peak velocity, and final deceleration of the preceding saccades. Results Subjects with vision loss (AMD, n = 6, and RP, n = 5) had larger oscillation amplitudes, longer decay constants, and lower frequencies than subjects with NV ( n = 7). The oscillation amplitudes increased with increases in saccade deceleration in all three groups. The other PSO parameters, however, did not show consistent correlations with either saccade amplitude or peak velocity. Conclusions Post-saccadic fixation stability in AMD and RP is reduced due to abnormal PSOs. The differences with respect to NV are not due to differences in saccade kinematics, suggesting that anatomic and neuronal variations affect the suspension of the iris and the lens in the patients’ eyes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.