2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurophysiological monitoring and spinal cord integrity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This study has some limitations. First, the potential for worsened surgical conditions due to higher muscle tone in the no-NMB group could have been predicted, and the investigation on them in moderate NMB rather than no NMB seems to be of more interest in terms of clinical application; nonetheless, no NMB in the present study reflects the NMB state in the common clinical practice in which total intravenous anesthesia with motor-evoked potential monitoring is used for spine surgery [36,37]. In addition, there have been no prior comparisons of deep vs. no NMB in spinal surgery; therefore, as the first study, we sought to determine whether deep NMB in spinal surgery was effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has some limitations. First, the potential for worsened surgical conditions due to higher muscle tone in the no-NMB group could have been predicted, and the investigation on them in moderate NMB rather than no NMB seems to be of more interest in terms of clinical application; nonetheless, no NMB in the present study reflects the NMB state in the common clinical practice in which total intravenous anesthesia with motor-evoked potential monitoring is used for spine surgery [36,37]. In addition, there have been no prior comparisons of deep vs. no NMB in spinal surgery; therefore, as the first study, we sought to determine whether deep NMB in spinal surgery was effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuromuscular blocking agents are routinely used to facilitate tracheal intubation during induction of anesthesia and are commonly used to improve surgical conditions during the maintenance of general anesthesia. However, there have also been several concerns about their effectiveness in improving surgical conditions and side effects, including delayed recovery, residual paralysis, and hypersensitivity reactions 1 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MEP only provides feedback after the spinal cord nerve function is damaged and does not have an early warning effect, so errors may occur due to poor resolution of weaker signals. At the same time, due to the susceptibility to muscle relaxants, the preoperative patient's motor function evaluation, anesthesia induction and quadruple stimulation muscle contraction tests need to be strictly controlled 23 . In addition, because MEP detection of electrical stimulation can easily cause tremor in patients after anesthesia, interfere with the operation of the surgeon, and even cause iatrogenic spinal cord injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%