2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurophysiological evidence for context-dependent encoding of sensory input in human auditory cortex

Abstract: Attention biases the way in which sound information is stored in auditory memory. Little is known, however, about the contribution of stimulus-driven processes in forming and storing coherent sound events. An electrophysiological index of cortical auditory change detection (mismatch negativity [MMN]) was used to assess whether sensory memory representations could be biased toward one organization over another (one or two auditory streams) without attentional control. Results revealed that sound representations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
70
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
8
70
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It exhibited the pattern of a contrast effect: that is, an increase in similarity led to a higher probability of perceiving 'Integration' than when the same level of similarity had been experienced all along; and likewise, a decrease in similarity led to a higher probability of perceiving 'Segregation'. This contrast effect might be surprising in view of priming studies that use the system's tendency to retain the previously dominant percept in spite of parameter changes (Sussman and Steinschneider 2006;Rahne and Sussman 2009). It is, however, consistent with recent observations by Snyder and colleagues (2009a;2009b), who showed that changes in frequency similarity can lead to either priming or contrast effects depending on the time-scales over which the change and subsequent perceptual evaluations take place (see also Rogers and Bregman 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It exhibited the pattern of a contrast effect: that is, an increase in similarity led to a higher probability of perceiving 'Integration' than when the same level of similarity had been experienced all along; and likewise, a decrease in similarity led to a higher probability of perceiving 'Segregation'. This contrast effect might be surprising in view of priming studies that use the system's tendency to retain the previously dominant percept in spite of parameter changes (Sussman and Steinschneider 2006;Rahne and Sussman 2009). It is, however, consistent with recent observations by Snyder and colleagues (2009a;2009b), who showed that changes in frequency similarity can lead to either priming or contrast effects depending on the time-scales over which the change and subsequent perceptual evaluations take place (see also Rogers and Bregman 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The regularities stored in memory provide the auditory context from which deviance detection takes place. Thus, the representation of sounds in memory (e.g., as one or two streams) forms the basis for evaluating incoming sound information (Sussman, 2005;Sussman and Steinschneider, 2006). Deviance detection is determined on the basis of the stored regularities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, MMN can be used to determine which regularities (individual features or pattern of sounds) are represented in sensory memory at the time the 'deviant' occurs. In this way, MMN can be used to evaluate the representation of the organization of a set of sounds as integrated or segregated (e.g., Müller et al, 2005;Ritter et al, 2006;Sussman et al, 1999Sussman et al, ,2005Sussman and Steinschneider, 2006;Yabe et al, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zeitgeist seems to be increasingly shifting from the concept of the primary auditory cortex as primarily a sensory processing structure to one that is cognitive in nature, albeit specializing in acoustic processing and hearing (e.g., King, 2006;Sussman and Steinschneider, 2006). Research that expands the domain of inquiry about the auditory cortex will undoubtedly substantially increase complexity and perhaps confusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%