Neurophysiological correlates of error correction in sensorimotor-synchronization

Praamstra, Peter; Turgeon, Martine; Hesse, C. W.; Wing, Alan M.; Perryer, L.

doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00351-3

Cited by 60 publications

(93 citation statements)

References 62 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, Repp (2002) showed that error correction performance for positive shifts was more variable than that of negative shifts. Furthermore, we have shown an over-correction for positive shifts as in previous studies (Praamstra et al, 2003;Thaut et al, 1998), whose degree was significantly less after practicing. By contrast, error correction of negative shifts was stable both during the testing sessions within a day, and during the testing sessions over a few days apart (Bijsterbosch et al, 2011a).…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 79%

“…The tones were presented with an IOI of 600 ms based on the finding that an anticipatory response (i.e., negative mean asynchrony) could be obtained within the IOI range from 450 to 1,500 ms (Miyake et al, 2004). While an IOI of 500 ms was utilized in Praamstra et al (2003), we extended it to 600 ms to allow more time for CNV generation as 500 ms might not be enough for detailed CNV analyses (see Figure 7, Praamstra et al, 2003). The tone sequence contained occasional phase shifts.…”

Section: Stimuli and Tasksmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The epochs were extracted comprising -100 ms to 600 ms, time-locked to stimulus presentation time (0 ms). We performed a baseline correction using the pre-stimulus interval from -50 ms to 0 ms (Praamstra et al, 2003), by computing the average voltage during the pre-stimulus interval and subtracting this voltage from each time point in the epoch. Epochs greater than ±75 mV were rejected from the study.…”

Section: Eeg Recordings and Data Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…By contrast, error correction of negative shifts was stable both during the testing sessions within a day, and during the testing sessions over a few days apart (Bijsterbosch et al, 2011a). Praamstra et al (2003) explicitly sought to find ERP correlates of error correction to negative vs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Interestingly, the error-related negativity (ERN; Gehring et al, 1990;Gehring et al, 1993) in averaged ERPs occurred around 200 ms after a positive shift, with a current source located in the medial prefrontal cortex, but no ERN was identified after a negative shift. The ERN is an ERP component that appears after the 6 execution of errors (Gehring et al, 1990;Gehring et al, 1993) and has been suggested to be associated with N2 (Praamstra et al, 2003). Determining whether or not these ERP components reflect the error correction mechanism itself or are associated with post-error processing (i.e., conscious awareness of errors) requires further investigation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Contingent negative variation (CNV) associated with sensorimotor timing error correction

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Detection and subsequent correction of sensorimotor timing errors is fundamental to adaptive behavior. Using scalp-recorded event-related potentials (ERPs), we sought to find ERP components that are predictive of error correction performance during rhythmic movements.Method: Healthy right-handed participants were asked to synchronize their finger taps to a regular tone sequence (every 600 ms), whilst EEG data were continuously recorded. Data from 15 participants were analyzed. Occasional irregularities were built into stimulus presentation timing: 90 ms before (advances: negative shift) or after (delays: positive shift) the expected time point. A tapping condition alternated with a listening condition in which identical stimulus sequence was presented but participants did not tap.Results: Behavioral error correction was observed immediately following a shift, with a degree of over-correction with positive shifts. Our stimulus-locked ERP data analysis revealed, 1) increased auditory N1 amplitude for the positive shift condition and decreased auditory N1 modulation for the negative shift condition; and 2) a second enhanced negativity (N2) in the tapping positive condition, compared with the tapping negative condition. In response-locked epochs, we observed a CNV (contingent negative variation)-like negativity with earlier latency in the tapping negative condition compared with the tapping positive condition. This CNV-like negativity peaked at around the onset of subsequent tapping, with the earlier the peak, the better the error correction performance with the negative shifts while the later the peak, the better the error correction performance with the positive shifts.Discussion: This study showed that the CNV-like negativity was associated with the error correction performance during our sensorimotor synchronization study. Auditory N1 and N2 were differentially involved in negative vs. positive error correction. However, we did not find 3 evidence for their involvement in behavioral error correction. Overall, our study provides the basis from which further research on the role of the CNV in perceptual and motor timing can be developed.

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 79%

Section: Stimuli and Tasksmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Eeg Recordings and Data Analysesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Contingent negative variation (CNV) associated with sensorimotor timing error correction

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Low frequency rTMS effects on sensorimotor synchronization

2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Previous studies using low frequency (1 Hz) rTMS over the motor and premotor cortex have examined repetitive movements, but focused either on motor aspects of performance such as movement speed, or on variability of the produced intervals. A novel question is whether TMS affects the synchronization of repetitive movements with an external cue (sensorimotor synchronization). In the present study participants synchronized finger taps with the tones of an auditory metronome. The aim of the study was to examine whether motor and premotor cortical inhibition induced by rTMS affects timing aspects of synchronization performance such as the coupling between the tap and the tone and error correction after a metronome perturbation. Metronome sequences included perturbations corresponding to a change in the duration of a single interval (phase shifts) that were either small and below the threshold for conscious perception (10 ms) or large and perceivable (50 ms). Both premotor and motor cortex stimulation induced inhibition, as reflected in a lengthening of the silent period. Neither motor nor premotor cortex rTMS altered error correction after a phase shift. However, motor cortex stimulation made participants tap closer to the tone, yielding a decrease in tap-tone asynchrony. This provides the first neurophysiological demonstration of a dissociation between error correction and tap-tone asynchrony in sensorimotor synchronization. We discuss the results in terms of current theories of timing and error correction.

show abstract

Time-based prediction in motor control: evidence from grip force response to external load perturbations

Kwok

Wing

2006

Exp Brain Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An object held in precision grip creates predictable load forces on the hand during voluntary hand movement and these are associated with anticipatory modulation of grip force. Conflicting results have been obtained over whether predictable external load perturbations result in anticipatory grip force responses (e.g. Blakemore et al. in J Neurosci 18(18):7511-7518, 1998; Weeks et al. in Exp Brain Res 132:404-410, 2000). This paper investigated whether the discrepancies reflect differences in the methods used in estimating the time delay. Subjects held a manipulandum that delivered load force perturbations in the form of pulses of variable duration and interval or periodic 0.5 and 1 Hz square waves or sinusoids. The grip forces exerted by the subjects were measured. Two methods were used to assess the time delay of the grip force in relation to the load force: (1) cross-spectral analysis, (2) a single threshold method applied on time-locked averaged data. Despite a phase lag shown by the cross-spectral analysis, the threshold method revealed grip force increased 264.8+/-40.2 ms before the onset of the load force when 0.5 Hz square waves were used as the load force perturbation and 70.2+/-17.0 ms before the load force when 1 Hz square waves were used. Computer simulations indicated that the single threshold method gives a more sensitive estimate of the onset time than the cross-spectral analysis. We conclude that discrepancies in previous studies reflect differences in the methods used to assess the time-delay and that there is an anticipatory component in the grip force response to predictable external load perturbation.

show abstract

Neurophysiological correlates of error correction in sensorimotor-synchronization

Cited by 60 publications

References 62 publications

Contingent negative variation (CNV) associated with sensorimotor timing error correction

Contingent negative variation (CNV) associated with sensorimotor timing error correction

Low frequency rTMS effects on sensorimotor synchronization

Time-based prediction in motor control: evidence from grip force response to external load perturbations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About