“…In part, this is due to considerable variability in both the operationalization of Bnegative^and in the selection of study populations. Negative words may be denotative (e.g., the word sad), connotative (e.g., the word failure), and/or evocative (e.g., taboo words) and have been selected as study items based on negative valence per se (e.g., Bailey & Chapman, 2012;Brandt, Nielsen, & Holmes, 2013;Cloitre, Cancienne, Brodsky, Dulit, & Perry, 1996;Patrick, Kiang, & Christensen, 2015;Wong & Moulds, 2008), because they are threat-related or traumarelated (e.g., Elzinga, de Beurs, Sergeant, van Dyck, & Phaf, 2000;Elzinga, Phaf, Ardon, & van Dyck, 2003;McNally, Clancy, & Schacter, 2001;McNally, Metzger, Lasko, Clancy, & Pitman, 1998;McNally, Otto, Yap, Pollack, & Hornig, 1999;Moulds & Bryant, 2002), or because they are relevant to a specific psychopathology (e.g., Korfine & Hooley, 2000;Liang, Hsu, Hung, Wang, & Lin, 2011;Tolin, Hamlin, & Foa, 2002). This variability in the definition of Bnegative^reflects the fact that the majority of studies have been aimed at elucidating memory control mechanisms underlying clinical disorders, vulnerabilities, and/or individual differences variables that have clinical relevance.…”