2005
DOI: 10.1002/mrdd.20085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurophysiologic evaluation of early cognitive development in high‐risk infants and toddlers

Abstract: New knowledge of the perceptual, discriminative, and memory capabilities of very young infants has opened the door to further evaluation of these abilities in infants who have risk factors for cognitive impairments. A neurophysiologic technique that has been very useful in this regard is the recording of event-related potentials (ERPs). The event-related potential (ERP) technique is widely used by cognitive neuroscientists to study cognitive abilities such as discrimination, attention, and memory. This method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The /b/‐/g/ discrimination is particularly affected by differences in both gestational and postnatal age. Prior evidence relating activity in the temporal regions to auditory perception and comprehension of verbal language (Binder, Desai, Graves, & Conant, ; Binder et al., ; Karunanayaka et al., ; Schmithorst, Holland, & Plante, ) suggests that the altered neural pattern observed in premature infant's auditory ERPs may be indicative of an increased risk for cognitive deficits (e.g., deRegnier, ; Fellman et al., ). This has already been demonstrated in full‐term infants at risk for dyslexia (e.g., Guttorm et al., ; Molfese, ), but still needs to be investigated in the preterm population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The /b/‐/g/ discrimination is particularly affected by differences in both gestational and postnatal age. Prior evidence relating activity in the temporal regions to auditory perception and comprehension of verbal language (Binder, Desai, Graves, & Conant, ; Binder et al., ; Karunanayaka et al., ; Schmithorst, Holland, & Plante, ) suggests that the altered neural pattern observed in premature infant's auditory ERPs may be indicative of an increased risk for cognitive deficits (e.g., deRegnier, ; Fellman et al., ). This has already been demonstrated in full‐term infants at risk for dyslexia (e.g., Guttorm et al., ; Molfese, ), but still needs to be investigated in the preterm population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many methods for screening, and it can be done as early as at birth or in the first year of life. 38,[42][43][44] The majority of publications indicate that screening is done during preschool years. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Two publications Thuraya Ahmed Al-Shidhani and Vinita Arora review | 291…”
Section: Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Modern improvements to evoked potential measurements offer a technology that is noninvasive, rapidly administered, and sensitive to stimulus differences in a range of modalities. 14 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%