1976
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(76)90265-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropharmacological actions of enkephalin after systemic administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears, thus, that only a small number of cells, possibly those which have already responded to activation signals, express opioid receptors and have the ability to elicit the response. T-cell-stimulatory effect of analogs (1) and (2) was found to be completely inhibited by 10 -5 M concentration of naloxone, an opioid antagonist [38]. The blockade of enkephalin-induced immune response by naloxone suggests that the stimulatory effect is due to the opioid moiety [2] and also implicates the mediation of the response by the classical opioid receptors on the immune cells [29].…”
Section: Peptide Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It appears, thus, that only a small number of cells, possibly those which have already responded to activation signals, express opioid receptors and have the ability to elicit the response. T-cell-stimulatory effect of analogs (1) and (2) was found to be completely inhibited by 10 -5 M concentration of naloxone, an opioid antagonist [38]. The blockade of enkephalin-induced immune response by naloxone suggests that the stimulatory effect is due to the opioid moiety [2] and also implicates the mediation of the response by the classical opioid receptors on the immune cells [29].…”
Section: Peptide Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…At a similar concentration, ß-FNA did not inhibit Met-enkephalin-stimulated proliferation (table 2). It could significantly inhibit proliferation stimulated with 10 -8 M concentration of analog (1) and analog (2). Nor-BNI showed no inhibitory effect on Met-enkephalin or analog (1)-and analog (2)-stimulated proliferation (table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While enkephalins administered parenterally are known to have central effects (Plotnikoff et al, 1976) and have been found to enter brain tissue readily in one study ), Cornford et al, (1978 and Rapoport and his colleagues (1980) have found that the opiate peptides have very low permeability into central sites. One possibility is that Met enkephalin enters discrete areas of the brain adjacent to neurones involved in cardiovascular control such as the area postrema or the circumventricular organs that have fenestrated capillaries (Weindl & Joynt, 1972).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%