1992
DOI: 10.1016/0922-4106(92)90095-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropeptide modulation of muscarinic receptors and function in cerebral cortex of young and senescent rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data can be interpreted as evidence that in vivo actions of V I P on the induction of REM sleep may be dependent on the effects of V I P on mPRF cholinergic tone. V I P has also been shown to modif y muscarinic, as well as nicotinic, receptor f unction (Mo and Dun, 1984;Kawatani et al, 1985;Pedigo and Rice, 1992;Gurantz et al, 1994;Cuevas and Adams, 1996). Effects of V I P on induction of REM sleep appear to be independent of muscarinic receptor activation, although this study was conducted in PC PA-treated animals, which may confound these conclusions (Prospero-García et al, 1993); however, effects of V I P after release of acetylcholine onto mPRF neurons or on mPRF nicotinic receptors f unction remain unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These data can be interpreted as evidence that in vivo actions of V I P on the induction of REM sleep may be dependent on the effects of V I P on mPRF cholinergic tone. V I P has also been shown to modif y muscarinic, as well as nicotinic, receptor f unction (Mo and Dun, 1984;Kawatani et al, 1985;Pedigo and Rice, 1992;Gurantz et al, 1994;Cuevas and Adams, 1996). Effects of V I P on induction of REM sleep appear to be independent of muscarinic receptor activation, although this study was conducted in PC PA-treated animals, which may confound these conclusions (Prospero-García et al, 1993); however, effects of V I P after release of acetylcholine onto mPRF neurons or on mPRF nicotinic receptors f unction remain unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%