2006
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropathy Among the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Cohort 8 Years After Trial Completion

Abstract: OBJECTIVE -To evaluate the impact of prior intensive diabetes therapy on neuropathy among former Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) participants.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -At the conclusion of the DCCT, subjects in the intensive group were encouraged to maintain intensive therapy, and subjects in the conventional group were encouraged to begin intensive therapy. Thereafter, we annually assessed neuropathy as part of the Epidemiology of Diabetes Intervention and Complications (EDIC) study. Neurop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
167
1
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
167
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The neuropathy definition was based on standardized examination and questionnaires, but not on a neurologist's history and examination or confirmatory measures (nerve conduction studies or skin biopsies). On the other hand, the MNSI questionnaire and examination are validated measures of neuropathy and have been used successfully in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic cohorts 28, 38, 39, 40. While the MNSI instruments have not been validated in Asian populations, the prevalence of neuropathy was comparable to a previous large Chinese cohort study using a different neuropathy definition 24.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The neuropathy definition was based on standardized examination and questionnaires, but not on a neurologist's history and examination or confirmatory measures (nerve conduction studies or skin biopsies). On the other hand, the MNSI questionnaire and examination are validated measures of neuropathy and have been used successfully in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic cohorts 28, 38, 39, 40. While the MNSI instruments have not been validated in Asian populations, the prevalence of neuropathy was comparable to a previous large Chinese cohort study using a different neuropathy definition 24.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore, insulin signaling appears to provide neurotrophic actions in the retina, and retinopathy may result in part from neurotrophin deficiency, as shown for peripheral neuropathy (102,103). In this light, the persistent benefit of initial intensive control in DCCT/ EDIC (Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications) patients despite subsequent deterioration of A1C values (104,105) could result from enhanced neurotrophic input from insulin on retinal and peripheral nerve cells.…”
Section: Reduced Insulin Action Leads To Neurodegenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beneficial effect of intensive treatment, proven by the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT) and the UK Prospective Diabetes Study, has been confirmed by new data in the recent years. During the follow-up of the DCCT cohort as part of the Epidemiology of Diabetes Intervention and Complications study, every type 1 diabetic patient was encouraged to apply intensive insulin treatment (81). It was clearly shown that the beneficial effect of 6.5 years of intensive therapy on the development and progression of the neuropathy persisted for at least 8 years after completion of the DCCT as the prevalence of neuropathy then still differed in the different groups despite the similar intensive treatment during the follow-up period.…”
Section: Therapeutic Approaches Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%