2023
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.2907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropathologic and Clinical Findings in Young Contact Sport Athletes Exposed to Repetitive Head Impacts

Ann C. McKee,
Jesse Mez,
Bobak Abdolmohammadi
et al.

Abstract: ImportanceYoung contact sport athletes may be at risk for long-term neuropathologic disorders, including chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).ObjectiveTo characterize the neuropathologic and clinical symptoms of young brain donors who were contact sport athletes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis case series analyzes findings from 152 of 156 brain donors younger than 30 years identified through the Understanding Neurologic Injury and Traumatic Encephalopathy (UNITE) Brain Bank who donated their brains fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(166 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for one individual who showed solely focal CTE lesions, all of the cases showed a wide range of pathologies. Interestingly, only the youngest participant had evidence of a single pathology of CTE‐NC, which is consistent with previous pathological reports of individuals with repetitive concussions [38–41] as well as in neurodegenerative diseases in general [42]. Numerous studies have now reported that copathologies are prevalent in CTE, especially in older age [17, 22, 38, 40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Except for one individual who showed solely focal CTE lesions, all of the cases showed a wide range of pathologies. Interestingly, only the youngest participant had evidence of a single pathology of CTE‐NC, which is consistent with previous pathological reports of individuals with repetitive concussions [38–41] as well as in neurodegenerative diseases in general [42]. Numerous studies have now reported that copathologies are prevalent in CTE, especially in older age [17, 22, 38, 40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…CTE-NC as a sole pathology has been seen in younger patients [40,41], and may facilitate the accumulation of other proteinopathies as the person ages. The phenotype of CTE-NC warrants further study, and biomarkers for its detection are in dire need.…”
Section: Clinicopathological Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TES criteria acknowledge that neurobehavioural dysregulation alone limits the diagnostic certainty of CTE-NC to 'suggestive of CTE' [22]. However, a recent study of 152 young contact and collision sport athletes under 30 years of age also did not find an association between clinical symptoms, including neurobehavioral dysregulation, and CTE-NC status (41.4% had CTE-NC), despite a high frequency of cognitive and neurobehavioural symptoms in this convenience sample [49]. Similarly, psychiatric features are also used to draw inferences relating to provisional levels of certainty that a research subject might harbour CTE-NC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…CTE-NC and ARTAG have been shown to share molecular and histopathological features, indicating a potential common aetiology [47]. However, it has been suggested that astrocyte pathology is more common in more advanced stages of CTE-NC [48] and is less common in younger individuals with CTE-NC [49]. Of the two cases that did not meet the criteria for CTE-NC, both had significant ARTAG in the form of granular fuzzy astrocytes in the cortex (Case 4) and thorny astrocytes in the subpial, subependymal, perivascular (Case 4) and white matter (Cases 4 and 5) [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The journal receives a high number of quality submissions (Table) with an acceptance rate of 9% overall and 6% for research articles, and we continue to emphasize service to authors in the hopes of making the process more efficient and useful. We focus tremendously on rapid turnaround for submitted manuscripts, and in 2023, the median time from receipt to first decision was 5 days without peer review and just more than a month with peer review.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%