2008
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01381.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurons in the Pontomedullary Reticular Formation Signal Posture and Movement Both as an Integrated Behavior and Independently

Abstract: Schepens B, Stapley P, Drew T. Neurons in the pontomedullary reticular formation signal posture and movement both as an integrated behavior and independently. J Neurophysiol 100: 2235-2253, 2008. First published July 16, 2008 doi:10.1152/jn.01381.2007. We have previously suggested that the discharge characteristics of some neurons in the pontomedullary reticular formation (PMRF) are contingent on the simultaneous requirement for activity in both ipsilateral flexor muscles and contralateral extensors. To test … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
93
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
9
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ipsilateral reticulospinal motor system has been previously implicated in the abnormal coactivation of shoulder abductors with distal limb flexors (flexion synergy) and the resultant loss of independent joint control in individuals with stroke (Dewald et al 1995(Dewald et al , 2001Ellis et al 2007;Schwerin et al 2008Schwerin et al , 2011Sukal et al 2007). Furthermore, animal evidence has demonstrated the involvement of reticular formation neurons in general during reaching (Buford and Davidson 2004;Drew 2006, 2004;Schepens et al 2008). The means by which selective increased reliance on ipsilateral reticular formation occurs is unclear since corticoreticular projections are bilateral in both the cat and monkey Kuypers 1984, 1989).…”
Section: Brain Stem Projections and Implications Of Current Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ipsilateral reticulospinal motor system has been previously implicated in the abnormal coactivation of shoulder abductors with distal limb flexors (flexion synergy) and the resultant loss of independent joint control in individuals with stroke (Dewald et al 1995(Dewald et al , 2001Ellis et al 2007;Schwerin et al 2008Schwerin et al , 2011Sukal et al 2007). Furthermore, animal evidence has demonstrated the involvement of reticular formation neurons in general during reaching (Buford and Davidson 2004;Drew 2006, 2004;Schepens et al 2008). The means by which selective increased reliance on ipsilateral reticular formation occurs is unclear since corticoreticular projections are bilateral in both the cat and monkey Kuypers 1984, 1989).…”
Section: Brain Stem Projections and Implications Of Current Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various descending pathways can then modulate the spinal cord for greater flexibility of basic reflexes. For instance, recent data recorded in cat showed that neurons in pontomedullary reticular formation can both ensure integrated or independent control of posture and reaching (Schepens and Drew, 2004;Schepens et al, 2008). Together, one can speculate that the basic coordinative structure could first emerge at the level of M1 depending on task demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimulation in the pontomedullary reticular formation (PMRF) evokes ipsilateral limb flexor and contralateral limb extensor muscle excitation sometimes accompanied by a reciprocal suppression of the antagonistic muscles. The PMRF is therefore not only involved in the control of locomotion (Matsuyama et al, 2004) and postural support during reaching movements (Schepens et al, 2008), but also in voluntary reaching (Buford and Davidson, 2004), and is thus in a position to relay reach related tectal output to arm muscles (Davidson and Buford, 2004). These findings and the short latencies presented in the present study could explain the presence of rapid arm muscle activity (Ͻ100 ms latency) that was time locked to the target appearance but not movement onset (Pruszynski et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%