2004
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0404136101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuronal nitric oxide synthase negatively regulates xanthine oxidoreductase inhibition of cardiac excitation-contraction coupling

Abstract: Although interactions between superoxide (O 2•؊ ) and nitric oxide underlie many physiologic and pathophysiologic processes, regulation of this crosstalk at the enzymatic level is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR), a prototypic superoxide O 2•؊ -producing enzyme, and neuronal nitric oxide synthase (NOS1) coimmunoprecipitate and colocalize in the sarcoplasmic reticulum of cardiac myocytes. Deficiency of NOS1 (but not endothelial NOS, NOS3) leads to profound increases in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

16
206
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
16
206
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The biphasic nature of SIN-1 may relate to the physiological regulation of basal and submaximal β-adrenergic-stimulated contractility with low peroxynitrite production (i.e., NOS1) [40], and the pathophysiological regulation of chronic β-adrenergic stimulation with high peroxynitrite production (i.e., NOS2), as occurs in heart failure [3]. Thus, it appears that low SIN-1 may potentially mimic the peroxynitrite production of NOS1, which is hypothesized to produce low concentrations of peroxynitrite due to a co-localization with xanthine oxidase [4]. NOS1 is considered a physiological regulator of cardiac function and is also thought to increase myocardial contractility [41].…”
Section: Sin-1 and Plb −/− Myocyte Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The biphasic nature of SIN-1 may relate to the physiological regulation of basal and submaximal β-adrenergic-stimulated contractility with low peroxynitrite production (i.e., NOS1) [40], and the pathophysiological regulation of chronic β-adrenergic stimulation with high peroxynitrite production (i.e., NOS2), as occurs in heart failure [3]. Thus, it appears that low SIN-1 may potentially mimic the peroxynitrite production of NOS1, which is hypothesized to produce low concentrations of peroxynitrite due to a co-localization with xanthine oxidase [4]. NOS1 is considered a physiological regulator of cardiac function and is also thought to increase myocardial contractility [41].…”
Section: Sin-1 and Plb −/− Myocyte Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuronal NOS (nNOS, NOS1) and endothelial NOS (eNOS, NOS3) are constitutively expressed, while inducible NOS (iNOS, NOS2) is only expressed during immune responses and many pathophysiological conditions of the myocardium, such as heart failure [3]. NOS1 co-localizes with xanthine oxidase [4], a superoxide (O 2 .-) producing enzyme, and may potentially lead to the production of low levels of peroxynitrite (ONOO − ), as nitric oxide and superoxide react with a very high rate constant [5]. When expressed, NOS2 is capable of producing large amounts of both nitric oxide and superoxide [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), NOS1 colocalizes with the ryanodine receptor (RYR), and activation of NOS1 positively modulates cardiac contractility. Also, NOS1 deficiency leads to an increase in xanthine oxidasedependent reactive-oxygen species activity, which dramatically depresses myocardial contractile function (4). In contrast, the NOS3 isoform coupled to the ␤ 3 adrenergic receptor (AR), inhibits L-type Ca 2ϩ channels and, thus, inhibits ␤-AR-mediated increases in myocardial contractility (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, NO has been recognized for its role in normal physiology, arising in part from its ability to act as a signal through regulation of guanylate cyclase (3) and to S-nitrosylate cysteinyl residues of proteins and peptides (3). In a recent issue of PNAS, we witnessed the emergence of a new paradigm wherein the interplay between different highly reactive species allows for complex and fast regulation of cellular processes whose disruption has potentially serious pathological consequences (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the myocyte there are three direct reaction pathways for NO: reaction with a target protein, namely, RyR (8); consumption via reaction with superox-ide produced by XOR (4); and reaction with myoglobin in a way that NO cannot traverse the cytosolic space (14). What Khan et al (4) have made evident is that NOS activity is very tightly regulated temporally, spatially, and quantitatively. Another key aspect of their study is that NO may serve not only to regulate particular protein targets but also to control another reactive diffusible signaling species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%