2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12881-020-0966-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuronal migration genes and a familial translocation t (3;17): candidate genes implicated in the phenotype

Abstract: Background: While Miller-Dieker syndrome critical region deletions are well known delineated anomalies, submicroscopic duplications in this region have recently emerged as a new distinctive syndrome. So far, only few cases have been described overlapping 17p13.3 duplications. Methods: In this study, we report on clinical and cytogenetic characterization of two new cases involving 17p13.3 and 3p26 chromosomal regions in two sisters with familial history of lissencephaly. Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization and ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, just a few patients with duplication of region pter → p13.1 of chromosome 17 have been described. In all cases, the diagnosed genomic imbalance was a consequence of malsegregation of the parent's reciprocal translocation [16][17][18][19]. The patients had a complex phenotype due to a combination of partial trisomy of the short arm of chromosome 17 and partial monosomy of another chromosome involved in the rearrangement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, just a few patients with duplication of region pter → p13.1 of chromosome 17 have been described. In all cases, the diagnosed genomic imbalance was a consequence of malsegregation of the parent's reciprocal translocation [16][17][18][19]. The patients had a complex phenotype due to a combination of partial trisomy of the short arm of chromosome 17 and partial monosomy of another chromosome involved in the rearrangement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%