2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17509-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuronal effects of glabellar botulinum toxin injections using a valenced inhibition task in borderline personality disorder

Abstract: Previous studies have indicated that glabellar botulinum toxin (BTX) injections may lead to a sustained alleviation of depression. This may be accomplished by the disruption of a facial feedback loop, which potentially mitigates the experience of negative emotions. Accordingly, glabellar BTX injection can attenuate amygdala activity in response to emotional stimuli. A prototypic condition with an excess of negative emotionality and impulsivity accompanied by elevated amygdala reactivity to emotional stimuli is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the well-established modulation of amygdala activity by emotion, we found evidence consistent with that of prior studies by Kim and colleagues 21 , Hennenlotter and colleagues 20 , and Kruger and colleagues 52 , in that the amygdala’s responsiveness to emotion can be modulated by local facial chemodenervation. We do acknowledge differences in direction of effects but note differences in the contrasts and baselines across experiments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition to the well-established modulation of amygdala activity by emotion, we found evidence consistent with that of prior studies by Kim and colleagues 21 , Hennenlotter and colleagues 20 , and Kruger and colleagues 52 , in that the amygdala’s responsiveness to emotion can be modulated by local facial chemodenervation. We do acknowledge differences in direction of effects but note differences in the contrasts and baselines across experiments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Supplementary Tables S1–S3 present the outcomes of the quality assessment for the included studies. Eleven out of seventeen studies (64.7%) were randomized [ 15 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ], whereas the other six non-randomized studies presented five case series (29.4%) [ 16 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ] and one open-label trial (5.9%) [ 38 ]. Among the case series, the condition was measured in a standard and reliable way, the outcomes were clearly reported, and four out of five (80.0%) case series had clear and appropriate statistical analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of masking, seven of the studies (41.2%) were double-blind, seven studies (41.2%) were open-label trials, two were single-blind (11.8%), and the remaining one (5.9%) had unknown masking ( Figure 3 A). Ten studies (58.8%) used parallel assignment [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 18 ], five (29.4%) used single-group assignment, one study used crossover assignment (5.9%), and the remaining study (5.9%) had concealed assignment ( Figure 3 B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations