2012
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e318246887e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuron-specific enolase and S100BB as outcome predictors in severe diffuse axonal injury

Abstract: Prognostic study, level III.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies (3, 5, 11, 18, 27, 32) show that the frequency of DAI is higher in severe TBI victims who have indirect signs of injury on CT, such as intraventricular hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage, rather than a normal CT scan. In this study, for the analyses of association with the consequences of trauma, patients with normal CT scans were analyzed separately from those with signs suggestive of DAI, and the presence of these signs was more frequent among patients who progressed to death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies (3, 5, 11, 18, 27, 32) show that the frequency of DAI is higher in severe TBI victims who have indirect signs of injury on CT, such as intraventricular hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage, rather than a normal CT scan. In this study, for the analyses of association with the consequences of trauma, patients with normal CT scans were analyzed separately from those with signs suggestive of DAI, and the presence of these signs was more frequent among patients who progressed to death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, NSE has excellent theoretical potential as a long-term prognostic biomarker and therapeutic indicator in neurological intensive care [12][13]. Several studies have suggested increased NSE concentrations in blood following TBI, indicating a potential clinical role as a biomarker of this injury [14][17]. However, its association with outcome remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, a contusion or other lesion, even if small in size, in a more critical part of the cerebral network would more severely affect brain connectivity and presumably not be accurately represented by the S100B level. In patients with only diffuse cerebral injuries, lower levels of S100B are usually present (Chabok et al, 2012). However, we included S100B levels sampled 12 h after injury, as earlier samples are more heavily influenced by extracranial trauma (Thelin et al, 2015) and we could not detect any correlation between age, gender and multitrauma with our levels of S100B (data not shown), hence proving its role as a marker of intracranial injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%