2018
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuromodulation of reinforced skill learning reveals the causal function of prefrontal cortex

Abstract: Accumulating evidence has suggested functional interactions between prefrontal cortex (PFC) and dissociable large-scale networks. However, how these networks interact in the human brain to enable complex behaviors is not well-understood. Here, using a combination of behavioral, brain stimulation and neuroimaging paradigms, we tested the hypothesis that human PFC is required for successful reinforced skill formation. We additionally tested the extent to which PFC-dependent skill formation is related to intrinsi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to previous studies applying disruptive prefrontal stimulation prior or during MSL 6972 our results did not reveal any significant effects of stimulation on motor performance. These discrepancies might arise from several differences in methodology, such as the presence of reward during task practice, the awareness of the sequential material to learn (implicit / explicit learning), the task features (e.g., unimanual / bimanual) or the specific stimulation patterns used (1Hz, 5Hz rTMS and single pulse TMS / TBS).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to previous studies applying disruptive prefrontal stimulation prior or during MSL 6972 our results did not reveal any significant effects of stimulation on motor performance. These discrepancies might arise from several differences in methodology, such as the presence of reward during task practice, the awareness of the sequential material to learn (implicit / explicit learning), the task features (e.g., unimanual / bimanual) or the specific stimulation patterns used (1Hz, 5Hz rTMS and single pulse TMS / TBS).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these elements and on the causal role of the striatum in reinforcement-based adjustments in motor commands ( Nakamura and Hikosaka, 2006 ; Williams and Eskandar, 2006 ), we suspect that this region may be crucial for the beneficial effect of reward observed in the present study. Notably, the cerebellum ( Carta et al., 2019 ; Heffley et al., 2018 ; Sendhilnathan et al., 2020 ; Vassiliadis et al., 2019 ; Wagner et al., 2017 ) and frontal areas ( Dayan et al, 2014 , 2018 ; Hamel et al., 2018 ; Palidis et al., 2019 ; Ramakrishnan et al., 2017 ; Sidarta et al., 2016 ) are also likely to contribute to reward-based motor learning. Further investigations are required to better delineate the neurophysiological bases of reward-related improvements in motor learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these elements and on the causal role of the striatum in reinforcement-based adjustments in motor commands (Nakamura and Hikosaka, 2006; Williams and Eskandar, 2006), we suspect that this region may be crucial for the beneficial effect of reward observed in the present study. Notably, the cerebellum (Carta et al, 2019; Heffley et al, 2018; Sendhilnathan et al, 2020; Vassiliadis et al, 2019; Wagner et al, 2017) and frontal areas (Dayan et al, 2018, 2014; Hamel et al, 2018; Palidis et al, 2019; Ramakrishnan et al, 2017; Sidarta et al, 2016) are also likely to contribute to reward-based motor learning. Further investigations are required to better delineate the neurophysiological bases of reward-related improvements in motor learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%