2021
DOI: 10.1177/15357597211065587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuromodulation for Refractory Epilepsy

Abstract: Three neuromodulation therapies, all using implanted device and electrodes, have been approved to treat adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, namely, the vagus nerve stimulation in 1995, deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS) in 2018 (2010 in Europe), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in 2014. Indications for VNS have more recently extended to children down to age of 4. Limited or anecdotal data are available in other epilepsy syndromes and refractory/super-refractory… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The question of whether responsive stimulation is more efficacious than continuous thalamic DBS remains to be addressed, as the two techniques have not been directly compared in the same subjects ( Burdette et al, 2020 ). There currently are no biomarkers which would predict the efficacy of RNS system for any approved or off-label applications ( Ryvlin and Jehi, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The question of whether responsive stimulation is more efficacious than continuous thalamic DBS remains to be addressed, as the two techniques have not been directly compared in the same subjects ( Burdette et al, 2020 ). There currently are no biomarkers which would predict the efficacy of RNS system for any approved or off-label applications ( Ryvlin and Jehi, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also challenging to make deductions from these studies regarding the effects of thalamic responsive stimulation on neurocognitive wellbeing, as only 1 out of 10 publications included formal neurocognitive testing at follow-up ( Burdette et al, 2021 ). Furthermore, whereas larger studies utilize responsive stimulation for several years before assessing the impact on seizure frequency, ( Ryvlin and Jehi, 2022 ) follow-up data for 12/29 of the subjects described in this review was obtained within 12 months from starting thalamic stimulation ( Osorio et al, 2005 ; Kokoszka et al, 2018 ; Burdette et al, 2020 , 2021 ; Kwon et al, 2020 ; Welch et al, 2021 ; Beaudreault et al, 2022 ). Finally, although seizure frequency was a primary outcome in all 10 studies, the RNS system cannot record for extended periods of time and does not track all data relating to seizure frequency ( Thomas and Jobst, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the growing amount of human clinical data and the increasing interest in ANT deep brain stimulation for management of DRE, there a still various open questions concerning the mechanisms, patient selection, electrode placement techniques, and optimal programming ( 106 , 107 ). In line with the role of the ANT as a network hub in limbic circuits, evidence exists that patients with temporal lobe epilepsy show a favorable response as compared to patients with frontal lobe epilepsy and epilepsies with other locations.…”
Section: Deep Brain Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VNS received FDA approval in 1997 for the treatment of focal-onset seizures ( DeGiorgio et al, 2000 ), which was then extended to children age 4 and older in 2017 ( Jain and Arya, 2021 ). In the United States, responsive neurostimulation (RNS) was approved by the FDA in 2013 for the treatment of focal epilepsy, while deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior thalamic nucleus (ANT) was approved for the treatment of focal epilepsy in 2018 (2010 in Europe) ( Ryvlin and Jehi, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%