NeuroRehabilitation 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12915-5_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurologische Frührehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 139 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hardly any current data are available for inpatient length of stay in phase B. A review article from 1999 described the heterogeneous distribution of the length of therapy, some with rapid improvements and some with extremely lengthy courses of treatment that took up to 12 months (4). Details of the duration of treatment are described in an earlier publication from 1996 (5): 34% of patients stayed in hospital for up to 3 months, 16% for 3 to 5 months, 31% for 5 to 12 months, and 19% for longer than a year.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hardly any current data are available for inpatient length of stay in phase B. A review article from 1999 described the heterogeneous distribution of the length of therapy, some with rapid improvements and some with extremely lengthy courses of treatment that took up to 12 months (4). Details of the duration of treatment are described in an earlier publication from 1996 (5): 34% of patients stayed in hospital for up to 3 months, 16% for 3 to 5 months, 31% for 5 to 12 months, and 19% for longer than a year.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%