Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury: III. Criterion-Related Validity and Sensitivity to Change in the NABIS Hypothermia-II Clinical Trial

Abstract

The Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NOS-TBI) is a measure assessing neurological functioning in patients with TBI. We hypothesized that the NOS-TBI would exhibit adequate concurrent and predictive validity and demonstrate more sensitivity to change, compared with other well-established outcome measures. We analyzed data from the National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia-II clinical trial. Participants were 16-45 years of age with severe TBI assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury. For analysis of criterion-related validity (concurrent and predictive), Spearman's rank-order correlations were calculated between the NOS-TBI and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), GOSExtended (GOS-E), Disability Rating Scale (DRS), and Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised (NRS-R). Concurrent validity was demonstrated through significant correlations between the NOS-TBI and GOS, GOS-E, DRS, and NRS-R measured contemporaneously at 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury (all p < 0.0013). For prediction analyses, the multiplicityadjusted p value using the false discovery rate was < 0.015. The 1-month NOS-TBI score was a significant predictor of outcome in the GOS, GOS-E, and DRS at 3 and 6 months postinjury (all p < 0.015). The 3-month NOS-TBI significantly predicted GOS, GOS-E, DRS, and NRS-R outcomes at 6 and 12 months postinjury (all p < 0.0015). Sensitivity to change was analyzed using Wilcoxon's signed rank-sum test of subsamples demonstrating no change in the GOS or GOS-E between 3 and 6 months. The NOS-TBI demonstrated higher sensitivity to change, compared with the GOS ( p < 0.038) and GOS-E ( p < 0.016). In summary, the NOS-TBI demonstrated adequate concurrent and predictive validity as well as sensitivity to change, compared with gold-standard outcome measures. The NOS-TBI may enhance prediction of outcome in clinical practice and measurement of outcome in TBI research.

Spectrum of outcomes following traumatic brain injury—relationship between functional impairment and health-related quality of life

“…The GOSE test was used as a measure of physical function, while the 36-Item Short Form Survery (SF-36) was used as an assessment of QoL. While both these assessment tools have been validated in the TBI population, there has been no definite characterisation of the relationship between physical disability and subjective perception of handicap [ 18 , 24 , 27 ].…”

Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers Are Associated With Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and αII-spectrin Breakdown Products in Brain Tissues Following Penetrating Ballistic-Like Brain Injury in Rats

“…One explanation for this difference is that more severe injuries that cause greater neurological deficits are more likely to result in generalized injury induced alterations in protein abundance. Thus, in clinical practice, the assessment of neurological deficits with rating scales such as the NOS-TBI may have more benefit for classification of injury severity ( 53 ) and prediction of extended outcomes ( 54 ) rather than predictive ability for specific chronic neurodegeneration.…”

Prevalence of persistent vegetative state in patients with severe traumatic brain injury and its trend during the past four decades: A meta-analysis

“…Vegetative state, also known as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) (Laureys et al, 2010), was first proposed by Jennet and Plum to describe the condition of a group of patients with severe brain injury who awoke from coma but still lacked detectable awareness (McCauley et al, 2013).…”