2016
DOI: 10.1161/jaha.116.004203
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurological Injury in Intermediate‐Risk Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Abstract: BackgroundThe application of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to intermediate‐risk patients is a controversial issue. Of concern, neurological injury in this group remains poorly defined. Among high‐risk and inoperable patients, subclinical injury is reported on average in 75% undergoing the procedure. Although this attendant risk may be acceptable in higher‐risk patients, it may not be so in those of lower risk.Methods and ResultsForty patients undergoing TAVI with the Edwards SAPIEN‐XT ™ prosth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of participants included in our meta‐analysis were derived from 2 large prospective registries, with the lack of information regarding delirium diagnostic criteria and timing of the delirium screening . Interestingly, while these 2 large studies reported lower incidence of IHPOD after TAVR (e.g., 3.8% and 4.6%), small studies included in our analysis report higher incidence of IHPOD after TAVR . Several participant‐ and procedural‐related factors, including age at admission, comorbid condition, TAVR access, and hospital complication rate, could explain the differences in the incidence of IHPOD between these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The majority of participants included in our meta‐analysis were derived from 2 large prospective registries, with the lack of information regarding delirium diagnostic criteria and timing of the delirium screening . Interestingly, while these 2 large studies reported lower incidence of IHPOD after TAVR (e.g., 3.8% and 4.6%), small studies included in our analysis report higher incidence of IHPOD after TAVR . Several participant‐ and procedural‐related factors, including age at admission, comorbid condition, TAVR access, and hospital complication rate, could explain the differences in the incidence of IHPOD between these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Seven studies assessed cognitive outcomes one month after TAVI (n = 287) . Overall cognitive performance significantly improved after TAVI (SMD = −0.33, 95% CI = −0.50 to −0.16; z = 3.83, P < .001) (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive function 6 months after TAVI was assessed in 4 studies (n = 326) . Overall cognitive performance remained unchanged 6 months after TAVI (SMD = −0.06, 95% CI = −0.21–0.10; z = 0.73, p = .47) (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clinical syndromes vary widely, from transient neurological deficits which completely resolve (TIA); to subtle, clinically-apparent stroke which may lie undetected; to minor or major stroke, or even death. Additionally, clinically-silent events have been detected at an alarming rate by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (7), with an incidence of 60% even among intermediate-risk patients (8). However, the impact of subclinical or silent CVEs over both the short-and long-term remains controversial (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%