2009
DOI: 10.2174/1874205x00903010054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurological Examination of the Upper Limb: A Study of Construct Validity

Abstract: Objective:We have previously demonstrated that neurological individual findings and patterns can be reliably assessed in the examination of the upper limb and also that they are related to pain, weakness, and/or numbness/tingling. This study aimed to study further aspects of the construct validity of the neurological examination.Methods:Blinded to patient-characteristics, two examiners assessed the function of 16 muscles, the sensibility in 7 territories, and the nerve-mechanosensitivity at 20 locations in 82 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the earliest publications on PMNE describe the need of thorough physical examination to diagnose the patient [18], in particular the presence of weakness in muscles innervated by the median nerve both in the hand and the forearm. The efficacy (sensitivity and specificity) of manual muscle testing of antagonist muscles to determine levels of focal neuropathies in the upper extremities have been established in randomized, blinded validity studies to 88–93 %, respectively [11,12].…”
Section: Clinical Diagnosis and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the earliest publications on PMNE describe the need of thorough physical examination to diagnose the patient [18], in particular the presence of weakness in muscles innervated by the median nerve both in the hand and the forearm. The efficacy (sensitivity and specificity) of manual muscle testing of antagonist muscles to determine levels of focal neuropathies in the upper extremities have been established in randomized, blinded validity studies to 88–93 %, respectively [11,12].…”
Section: Clinical Diagnosis and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application in people with upper limb pain in the primary health sector [ 16 ] and in clinical occupational medicine [ 17 - 19 ] of a physical examination consisting of semi-quantitative ratings of selective muscle weakness, sensory deviations from normal in homonymous innervation territories and disturbed mechano-sensitivity of nerve trunks has revealed high frequencies of neurological patterns in accordance with neuropathies with various locations. The clinical applicability and feasibility of this approach, which is based on the classical neurological examination, is indicated by good inter-examiner reliability [ 17 , 20 - 22 ], construct validity in terms of correlation of physical findings to symptoms [ 19 ], and significant interrelations of locations of defined focal neuropathy [ 23 ]. The majority of the patients that were subjected to this examination displayed neurological physical patterns in accordance with brachial plexopathy with a prevailing infraclavicular location [ 16 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brachial plexopathy can be defined as a combination of symptoms (pain or subjective weakness or sensory abnormalities) and physical findings (weakness in defined muscles, mechanical allodynia at the brachial plexus, and sensory deviations from normal with specific locations). This physical approach permits the examiner to diagnose brachial plexopathy and to define its location precisely [ 17 , 20 ] and accurately [ 19 , 23 ] in a significant number of symptomatic patients, including patients that are diagnostically unclassifiable according to standard diagnostic criteria [ 17 , 20 , 34 ]. With the application of this diagnostic approach, brachial plexopathy with an infraclavicular location was found to be the most frequent diagnosis in a sample of people with upper limb pain in the primary health sector [ 16 ] as well as among patients referred to a department of occupational medicine [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%