2023
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000202376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurological Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (P12-13.004)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) Timing is crucial for identifying n-irAEs, as they usually emerge within 3-6 months after initiating ICI treatment, with a median onset of 4 weeks (ranging from 1 to 85 weeks) [9,[22][23][24][25]. Neurological symptoms emerging beyond 6 months after the last ICI dose are less likely to be secondary to an irAE, although it cannot be entirely ruled out solely on this basis [8]; (b) Clinical and/or radiological evidence of cancer control coinciding with the onset of neurological symptoms supports n-irAE diagnosis rather than attributing the symptoms to cancer progression [22]; (c) The concurrent occurrence of neurological symptoms with other irAEs increases the likelihood of a n-irAE [11,22]; (d) A positive response to ICI interruption and/or immunosuppression also suggests a n-irAE, although it is not a definitive indicator [8].…”
Section: Approaching the Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(a) Timing is crucial for identifying n-irAEs, as they usually emerge within 3-6 months after initiating ICI treatment, with a median onset of 4 weeks (ranging from 1 to 85 weeks) [9,[22][23][24][25]. Neurological symptoms emerging beyond 6 months after the last ICI dose are less likely to be secondary to an irAE, although it cannot be entirely ruled out solely on this basis [8]; (b) Clinical and/or radiological evidence of cancer control coinciding with the onset of neurological symptoms supports n-irAE diagnosis rather than attributing the symptoms to cancer progression [22]; (c) The concurrent occurrence of neurological symptoms with other irAEs increases the likelihood of a n-irAE [11,22]; (d) A positive response to ICI interruption and/or immunosuppression also suggests a n-irAE, although it is not a definitive indicator [8].…”
Section: Approaching the Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include a wide range of conditions, such as infections (viral or bacterial), cancer progression (including leptomeningeal carcinomatosis), metabolic issues (hypothyroidism, hypercalcemia), nutritional deficiencies, neurotoxicity from other treatments (e.g., platinum-induced sensory neuronopathy and cognitive side effects from radiotherapy), epilepsy, and vascular causes. Other features can help to suspect irAEs: Timing is crucial for identifying n-irAEs, as they usually emerge within 3–6 months after initiating ICI treatment, with a median onset of 4 weeks (ranging from 1 to 85 weeks) [ 9 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Neurological symptoms emerging beyond 6 months after the last ICI dose are less likely to be secondary to an irAE, although it cannot be entirely ruled out solely on this basis [ 8 ]; Clinical and/or radiological evidence of cancer control coinciding with the onset of neurological symptoms supports n-irAE diagnosis rather than attributing the symptoms to cancer progression [ 22 ]; The concurrent occurrence of neurological symptoms with other irAEs increases the likelihood of a n-irAE [ 11 , 22 ]; A positive response to ICI interruption and/or immunosuppression also suggests a n-irAE, although it is not a definitive indicator [ 8 ].…”
Section: General Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations