2017
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurological Autoantibody Prevalence in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Autoimmune epilepsy is an underrecognized condition, and its true incidence is unknown. Identifying patients with an underlying autoimmune origin is critical because these patients' condition may remain refractory to conventional antiseizure medications but may respond to immunotherapy.OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of neurological autoantibodies (Abs) among adult patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSConsecutive patients presenting to neurology services… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
223
7
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
223
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in agreement with recent reports from unselected children with new‐onset seizures, in which 1.9% had unspecific voltage‐gated potassium channel (VGKC)‐complex reactivity and 3.9% had reactivity to mouse neuropil (Garcia‐Tarodo et al, ). Our findings contrast somewhat to those in another adult cohort, in which 13 of 35 (37%) of patients with new‐onset epilepsy of unknown etiology were antibody‐positive (Dubey, Alqallaf, et al, ). Importantly, we included patients with new‐onset single seizures in our cohort, which may explain part of the difference.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are in agreement with recent reports from unselected children with new‐onset seizures, in which 1.9% had unspecific voltage‐gated potassium channel (VGKC)‐complex reactivity and 3.9% had reactivity to mouse neuropil (Garcia‐Tarodo et al, ). Our findings contrast somewhat to those in another adult cohort, in which 13 of 35 (37%) of patients with new‐onset epilepsy of unknown etiology were antibody‐positive (Dubey, Alqallaf, et al, ). Importantly, we included patients with new‐onset single seizures in our cohort, which may explain part of the difference.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of suspicious d ej a vu may also reflect the presence of a continuum between physiological d ej a vu and epileptic d ej a vu. In cohorts comprising new onset and established epilepsies, 15 to 22% of individuals with focal epilepsy of unknown cause had detectable serum neurological autoantibodies 35,36 ; whether these cases have a true autoimmune etiology remains uncertain. 33 The minor disturbance of function responsible for d ej a vu in the healthy brain may possibly propagate further and with greater intensity in the brain of some relatives of patients with MTLE, leading to suspicious d ej a vu, and even more so in the epileptic brain, resulting in epileptic d ej a vu.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, primary immunemediated epilepsies are recognised as neural autoantibody disorders affecting both cellsurface expressed proteins such as LGI1 and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, and intacellular proteins such as GAD [11]. A study of neural auto-antibodies in epilepsies of apparent unknown aetiology suggested that immune activation may explain up to 20% of nonparaneoplastic cases [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%