Neuroinflammation and subarachnoid hemorrhage: a revised look at the literature

Sriram, Sriniwas; Cutler, Christopher; Azab, Mohammed A.; Reddy, Ramya; Peart, Rodeania; Lucke‐Wold, Brandon

doi:10.53388/crc20220014

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 133 publications

(149 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Neuroinflammation seems to have a crucial role in aneurysm formation and rupture and seems to be involved in vasospasm, hydrocephalus, and headache in patients with SAH (34,35). It would be interesting to analyze, in a large prospective study, whether a higher level of neuroinflammation is associated with a higher risk of intra-procedural complications during endovascular treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Incidence of intra-procedural complications according to the timing of endovascular treatment in ruptured intracranial aneurysms

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundAlthough endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms is well-established, some critical issues have not yet been clarified, such as the effects of timing on safety and effectiveness of the procedure. The aim of our study was to analyze the incidence of intra-procedural complications according to the timing of treatment, as they can affect morbidity and mortality.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent endovascular treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms at three high flow center. For all patients, imaging and clinical data, aneurysm's type, mean dimension and different treatment techniques were analyzed. Intra-procedural complications were defined as thrombus formation at the aneurysm's neck, thromboembolic events, and rupture of the aneurysm. Patients were divided into three groups according to time between subarachnoid hemorrhage and treatment (<12 h hyper-early, 12–36 h early, and >36 h delayed).ResultsThe final study population included 215 patients. In total, 84 patients (39%) underwent hyper-early, 104 (48%) early, and 27 (13%) delayed endovascular treatment. Overall, 69% of the patients were treated with simple coiling, 23% with balloon-assisted coiling, 1% with stent-assisted coiling, 3% with a flow-diverter stent, 3% with an intrasaccular flow disruptor device, and 0.5% with parent vessel occlusion. Delayed endovascular treatment was associated with an increased risk of total intra-procedural complications compared to both hyper-early (p = 0.009) and early (p = 0.004) treatments with a rate of complications of 56% (vs. 29% in hyper-early and 26% in early treated group—p = 0.011 and p = 0.008). The delayed treatment group showed a higher rate of thrombus formation and thromboembolic events. The increased risk of total intra-procedural complications in delayed treatment was confirmed, also considering only the patients treated with simple coiling and balloon-assisted coiling (p = 0.005 and p = 0.003, respectively, compared to hyper-early and early group) with a rate of complications of 62% (vs. 28% in hyper-early and 26% in early treatments—p = 0.007 and p = 0.003). Also in this subpopulation, delayed treated patients showed a higher incidence of thrombus formation and thromboembolic events.ConclusionsEndovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms more than 36 h after SAH seems to be associated with a higher risk of intra-procedural complications, especially thrombotic and thromboembolic events.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%