“…It is important to stress that few studies have prospectively examined substantial pediatric epilepsy populations with a primary view to evaluate imaging (Wang et al., 1997; King et al., 1998; Berg et al., 2000; Shinnar et al., 2001; Chang et al., 2002). Aside from studies in emergency departments where CT is the imaging modality of choice (McAbee et al., 1989; Warden et al., 1997; Garvey et al., 1998; Maytal et al., 2000; Chang et al., 2002; Sharma et al., 2003), none have sought to define indications for MRI and thus are uncontrolled studies and do not meet criteria for class 1 studies (Landfish et al., 1992; Gibbs et al., 1993; Bronen et al., 1996; Caraballo et al., 1997; Harvey et al., 1997; Garvey et al., 1998; Guidelines for neuroimaging evaluation of patients with uncontrolled epilepsy considered for surgery, 1998; King et al., 1998; Kramer et al., 1998; Berg et al., 2000; Hirtz et al., 2000; Jallon et al., 2001; Chang et al., 2002; Kuzniecky & Knowlton, 2002; Bernal & Altman, 2003; Gelisse et al., 2003; Eltze et al., 2005; Korff & Nordli, 2005). Table 1 lists prospective and retrospective studies since 1989 that incorporate some form of imaging using CT and/or MRI that involve more than 30 children.…”