2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24647-0_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroheuristics of Decision Making: From Neuronal Activity to EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed several ERP components and the comparison between the two experimental conditions confirmed a positive-negative component waveform in the 150 − 400 ms time-range [113]. This waveform was more visible when participants made an offer (the proposer condition) and included a positive wave at a latency of about 200 ms, 'P200', and a negative deflection, at about 250-300 ms, the 'FRN'.…”
Section: Event-related Potentialssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We observed several ERP components and the comparison between the two experimental conditions confirmed a positive-negative component waveform in the 150 − 400 ms time-range [113]. This waveform was more visible when participants made an offer (the proposer condition) and included a positive wave at a latency of about 200 ms, 'P200', and a negative deflection, at about 250-300 ms, the 'FRN'.…”
Section: Event-related Potentialssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In addition, we investigated the role of individual differences, in particular the personality characteristics of honesty-humility, emotionality, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience [2] as factors potentially affecting the willingness-to-share. We also explore the neurobiological correlates of the decision-making process, extending our previous study [113]. In particular, we present here the ERPs associated with sub-processes of emotional salience detection (P200), combining incoming information into an emerging emotional representation (FRN), as well as decision-making stages (as indicated by behavioural results) in all participants.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contactless monetary transactions are rapidly increasing in all socio-cultural environments and in the absence of effective face-to-face negotiations it seems crucial to gain a better understanding of decision-making processes. The observation that individuals characterized by well-defined impairments in decision making, as they tend to take decisions not advantageous for their personal lives and for their social status, may also be characterized by biophysical measurements associated with brain activity led to define the Somatic Markers Hypothesis (Bechara et al, 1994; Bechara and Damasio, 2005; Rilling and Sanfey, 2011; Villa et al, 2012). The observation of such somatic markers is important to investigate the neural basis of decision making processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%