The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2357-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurogenetic Variant Analysis by Optical Genome Mapping for Structural Variation Detection-Balanced Genomic Rearrangements, Copy Number Variants, and Repeat Expansions/Contractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since some repeat expansion disorders have overlapping phenotypic characteristics and strong heterogeneity of symptoms, this option of analyzing the entire human genome at once, proves a large benefitand would allow OGM to become a truly generic test for all established expansion disorders for which expansions lead to SVs >500bp or even ~300 bp as shown for the smallest alleles here (DMPK_04). In line with this, 11 additional samples with a repeat expansion in ATXN10 (Morato Torres et al 2022), C9orf72 (Barseghyan et al 2022), FXN, NOP56 or STARD7 were also analyzed successfully (Supplemental Table S3), suggesting indeed that OGM is suited for most known repeat expansion disorders. Finally, if a repeat expansion disorder is suspected, but is not confirmed by OGM, the generated de novo assembly still allows to identify different types of SVs including other insertions and deletions, but also deletions, inversions and translocations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since some repeat expansion disorders have overlapping phenotypic characteristics and strong heterogeneity of symptoms, this option of analyzing the entire human genome at once, proves a large benefitand would allow OGM to become a truly generic test for all established expansion disorders for which expansions lead to SVs >500bp or even ~300 bp as shown for the smallest alleles here (DMPK_04). In line with this, 11 additional samples with a repeat expansion in ATXN10 (Morato Torres et al 2022), C9orf72 (Barseghyan et al 2022), FXN, NOP56 or STARD7 were also analyzed successfully (Supplemental Table S3), suggesting indeed that OGM is suited for most known repeat expansion disorders. Finally, if a repeat expansion disorder is suspected, but is not confirmed by OGM, the generated de novo assembly still allows to identify different types of SVs including other insertions and deletions, but also deletions, inversions and translocations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In line with this, 11 additional samples with a repeat expansion in ATXN10 (Morato Torres et al . 2022) , C9orf72 (Barseghyan et al 2022), FXN , NOP56 or STARD7 were also analyzed successfully ( Supplemental Table S3 ), suggesting indeed that OGM is suited for most known repeat expansion disorders. Finally, if a repeat expansion disorder is suspected, but is not confirmed by OGM, the generated de novo assembly still allows to identify different types of SVs including other insertions and deletions, but also deletions, inversions and translocations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the third protocol, we demonstrate a workflow to assess the known repeat expansion loci in ATXN10 (Morato Torres et al, 2022), C9orf72 (Barseghyan et al, 2022), CNBP (van der Sanden et al, 2024), DMPK (Otero et al, 2021), FMR1 (Iqbal et al, 2023), FXN (Yu et al, 2024), NOP56 (Lam et al, 2023), RFC1 (Facchini et al, 2023), and STARD7 (van der Sanden et al, 2024). These were selected because OGM has previously proven to be able to detect expansions of these repeat loci.…”
Section: Manual De Novo Assembly Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, this means that all current repeat expansion detection methods still have their own limitations, with the inability to accurately detect the exact repeat length of (very) large repeats and assessing the somatic instability of repeat expansions being the most important diagnostic limitations. Optical genome mapping (OGM) is another long‐read technology, which can be used as a cost‐effective and easy‐to‐use alternative for structural variant (SV) detection (Barseghyan et al., 2022, 2023) and is also capable of detecting STR expansions and contractions (Facchini et al., 2023; Guruju et al., 2023; Iqbal et al., 2023). By scanning ultra‐high‐molecular‐weight (UHMW) DNA that is labeled at CTTAAG sequence motifs and subsequently assembling genomes and mapping the assemblies against a reference genome, OGM can identify different types of SVs, including insertions, duplications, deletions, inversions, and translocations (Mantere et al., 2021; Neveling et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplification-free targeted sequencing and optical genome mapping (OGM) have been used to confirm somatic mosaicism in patient-derived DNA, containing the ancestral motif and mutant ATCCT or ATTCC [ 52 ]. Indeed, OGM is emerging as a powerful platform to delineate complex structural variation, including repeat expansions [ 53 ]. However, current clinical diagnostic testing protocols for SCA10 do not utilise these technologies, instead opting for fragment analysis via capillary array electrophoresis and Southern blot.…”
Section: Pentanucleotide Repeatsmentioning
confidence: 99%