2014
DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000000272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Vestibular Schwannoma Treatment

Abstract: Microsurgery seems to have the worse overall results, while SR has very good tumor control with poor useful hearing preservation. If a patient qualifies for CM, he is likely to show the most satisfactory results with the least treatment available. A close follow-up on ChT clinical trials and possible side-effects is warranted as preliminary short-term results are quite favorable. Additional long-term studies are required for a better understanding of this disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physicians are faced with difficult dilemmas when managing VS in NF2 patients [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. The available active interventions—in addition to the sequelae of the disease itself—may have significant side effects and could result in the (further) losses of hearing, balance, and facial nerve and trigeminal nerve function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Physicians are faced with difficult dilemmas when managing VS in NF2 patients [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. The available active interventions—in addition to the sequelae of the disease itself—may have significant side effects and could result in the (further) losses of hearing, balance, and facial nerve and trigeminal nerve function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The management of VS in NF2 is challenging. Current strategies include active surveillance, surgery, PhRT, and pharmacotherapy with bevacizumab [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Photon radiotherapy achieves a high tumor control, either as fractionated PhRT or single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but side effects, such as decreased hearing, vestibular complaints, or the increased impairment of facial nerve and trigeminal nerve function, are not uncommon [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation might be the alternative choice for residual tumor. In the Maniakas and Saliba [ 14 ] study in 2014, SR have better tumor control than microsurgery; however, microsurgery had better hearing preservation than radiation. Mathieu et al [ 15 ] reported that gamma knife had a high local tumor control rate of 81% in 15 years, [ 16 ] but the hearing preservation at 5 years was 48%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][19][20][21] By contrast, in a systematic review of NF2-associated VSs, surgical resection alone resulted in a 45.4% recurrence rate during an average follow-up time of 4.15 years. 22 Comparatively, of tumors that had prior surgery (N = 96) in this study, the type of SRS (adjuvant or salvage after recurrence) was specified in 72 tumors. Of these 72 tumors, SRS was used as salvage therapy after recurrence in 90.3%.…”
Section: Tumor Control and Serviceable Hearing Preservationmentioning
confidence: 99%